Page 68 - Read Online
P. 68

Page 16 of 19            Masiero et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:4  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.104

               10.      Nguyen V, Mathieu T, Melissopoulou M, et al. Sex differences in the progression of aortic stenosis and prognostic implication: the
                   COFRASA-GENERAC Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:499-501.  DOI  PubMed
               11.      McNeely C, Vassileva C. Mitral valve surgery in women: another target for eradicating sex inequality. Circ Cardiovasc Qual
                   Outcomes 2016;9:S94-6.  DOI  PubMed
               12.      Tribouilloy C, Bohbot Y, Rusinaru D, et al. Excess mortality and undertreatment of women with severe aortic stenosis. J Am Heart
                   Assoc 2021;10:e018816.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               13.      Généreux P, Stone GW, O'Gara PT, et al. Natural history, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic strategies for patients with
                   asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:2263-88.  DOI  PubMed
               14.      Steeds RP, Messika-Zeitoun D, Thambyrajah J, et al; IMPULSE registry group. IMPULSE: the impact of gender on the presentation
                   and management of aortic stenosis across Europe. Open Heart 2021;8:e001443.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               15.      Singh A, Chan DCS, Greenwood JP, et al. Symptom onset in aortic stenosis: relation to sex differences in left ventricular remodeling.
                   JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:96-105.  DOI  PubMed
               16.      Dobson LE, Musa TA, Uddin A, et al. Gender influences left ventricular remodelling in the setting of aortic stenosis but does not
                   appear to impact on reverse remodelling following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17:P332.
                   DOI
               17.      Bech-hanssen O, Wallentin I, Houltz E, Beckman Suurküla M, Larsson S, Caidahl K. Gender differences in patients with severe aortic
                   stenosis: impact on preoperative left ventricular geometry and function, as well as early postoperative morbidity and mortality. Eur J
                   Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:24-30.  DOI  PubMed
               18.      Chin CW, Khaw HJ, Luo E, et al. Echocardiography underestimates stroke volume and aortic valve area: implications for patients with
                   small-area low-gradient aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol 2014;30:1064-72.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               19.      Michelena HI, Margaryan E, Miller FA, et al. Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow
                   tract important? Heart 2013;99:921-31.  DOI  PubMed
               20.      Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll
                   Cardiol 2012;60:1845-53.  DOI  PubMed
               21.      Tastet L, Kwiecinski J, Pibarot P, et al. Sex-related differences in the extent of myocardial fibrosis in patients with aortic valve
                   stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13:699-711.  DOI  PubMed
               22.      Boulif J, Gerber B, Slimani A, et al. Assessment of aortic valve calcium load by multidetector computed tomography. Anatomical
                   validation, impact of scanner settings and incremental diagnostic value. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2017;11:360-6.  DOI  PubMed
               23.      Nguyen V, Cimadevilla C, Estellat C, et al. Haemodynamic and anatomic progression of aortic stenosis. Heart 2015;101:943-7.  DOI
                   PubMed
               24.      Tuncay V, Prakken N, van Ooijen PM, Budde RP, Leiner T, Oudkerk M. Semiautomatic, quantitative measurement of aortic valve
                   area using CTA: validation and comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:648283.  DOI  PubMed
                   PMC
               25.      Kamperidis V, van Rosendael PJ, Katsanos S, et al. Low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction:
                   reclassification of severity by fusion of Doppler and computed tomographic data. Eur Heart J 2015;36:2087-96.  DOI  PubMed
               26.      Clavel MA, Pibarot P, Messika-Zeitoun D, et al. Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients
                   with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1202-13.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               27.      Nchimi A, Dibato JE, Davin L, Schoysman L, Oury C, Lancellotti P. Predicting disease progression and mortality in aortic stenosis: a
                   systematic review of imaging biomarkers and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2018;5:112.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               28.      Pradelli D, Faden G, Mureddu G, et al. Impact of aortic or mitral valve sclerosis and calcification on cardiovascular events and
                   mortality: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2013;170:e51-5.  DOI  PubMed
               29.      Di Minno MND, Poggio P, Conte E, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with aortic valve calcification: a
                   systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2019;13:190-5.  DOI  PubMed
               30.      Myasoedova VA, Di Minno A, Songia P, et al. Sex-specific differences in age-related aortic valve calcium load: a systematic review
                   and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2020;61:101077.  DOI  PubMed
               31.      Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, et al. Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography:
                   correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart
                   2011;97:721-6.  DOI  PubMed
               32.      Clavel MA, Messika-Zeitoun D, Pibarot P, et al. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new
                   insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:2329-38.  DOI
                   PubMed
               33.      Voisine M, Hervault M, Shen M, et al. Age, sex, and valve phenotype differences in fibro-calcific remodeling of calcified aortic valve.
                   J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e015610.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               34.      Kvidal P, Bergström P, Hörte L, Ståhle E. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol
                   2000;35:747-56.  DOI  PubMed
               35.      Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al; Writing Committee Members. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients
                   with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint
                   Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:450-500.  DOI  PubMed
               36.      Singh A, Musa TA, Treibel TA, et al. Sex differences in left ventricular remodelling, myocardial fibrosis and mortality after aortic
                   valve replacement. Heart 2019;105:1818-24.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               37.      Shan Y, Pellikka PA. Aortic stenosis in women. Heart 2020;106:970-6.  DOI  PubMed
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73