Page 72 - Read Online
P. 72

Annibali et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:12                  Mini-invasive Surgery
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2021.101



               Review                                                                        Open Access



               Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve

               replacement: the challenge of the next future


               Gianmarco Annibali, Innocenzo Scrocca, Giuseppe Musumeci
               Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin 10128, Italy.

               Correspondence to: Dr. Giuseppe Musumeci, Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano Umberto I, Largo
               Filippo Turati, 62, Turin 10128, Italy. E-mail: giuseppe.musumeci@gmail.com

               How to cite this article: Annibali G, Scrocca I, Musumeci G. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the challenge
               of the next future. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:12. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.101

               Received: 27 Aug 2021   First Decision: 13 Dec 2021   Revised: 14 Jan 2022  Accepted: 27 Jan 2022   Published: 24 Feb 2022

               Academic Editor: Andrea Scotti   Copy Editor: Yue-Yue Zhang  Production Editor: Yue-Yue Zhang

               Abstract
               In recent years, an increasing number of bioprostheses have been implanted, and in the near future more and more
               patients will be candidates for reoperation due to structural deterioration of the valve. Valve-in-valve transcatheter
               aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) has become a safe and effective alternative to surgery and is currently
               approved for higher-risk, inoperable patients. From the most recent studies, early mortality has decreased and
               improvements in symptoms and quality of life of treated patients have been documented. ViV TAVR is a complex
               procedure that can present many pitfalls and therefore must be performed in high volume centers and with
               experienced staff because the risk of peri- and post-procedural complications is much higher than TAVR on native
               valve. In this review, we analyze the main procedural issues reported in the literature during ViV TAVR procedures:
               elevated postprocedural gradients, coronary obstruction and thrombosis of the leaflets of the bioprosthesis.
               Because of the opening of TAVR to younger and younger patients, thus with a longer life expectancy than the
               durability of the bioprosthesis, the next challenge will be the management of the lifetime strategy of patients with
               aortic stenosis, as the first type of intervention will influence all future therapeutic choices of our patient.

               Keywords: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement, valve-in-valve, structural valve deterioration, bioprosthetic
               valve failure




               INTRODUCTION
               In the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has dramatically changed the







                           © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing,
                           adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as
               long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
               indicate if changes were made.

                                                                                            www.misjournal.net
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77