Page 41 - Read Online
P. 41
Page 12 of 13 Parra et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:16 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.01
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
Not applicable.
Conflicts of interest
Gómez Rivas J is the editorial member of Mini-invasive Surgery, while the other authors have declared that
they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by our internal Institutional Review Board (IRB) committee, with Approval No:
23-038. Besides, the consent to participate was obtained from every patient.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.
REFERENCES
1. Capitanio U, Bensalah K, Bex A, et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2019;75:74-84. DOI PubMed PMC
2. Finelli A, Ismaila N, Bro B, et al. Management of small renal masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice
Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:668-80. DOI PubMed
3. Bhindi B, Lohse CM, Mason RJ, et al. Are we using the best tumor size cut-points for renal cell carcinoma staging? Urology
2017;109:121-6. DOI PubMed
4. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al; Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Urological Association. Guideline for
management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009;182:1271-9. DOI PubMed
5. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2022 update.
Eur Urol 2022;82:399-410. DOI PubMed
6. Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: kidney cancer, Version 2.2024. J Natl Compr Canc Netw
2024;22:4-16. DOI PubMed
7. Vilaseca A, Guglielmetti G, Vertosick EA, et al. Value of partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors of ct2 or greater stage: a risk-
benefit analysis of renal function preservation versus increased postoperative morbidity. Eur Urol Oncol 2020;3:365-71. DOI
PubMed PMC
8. Aron M, Gill IS, Campbell SC. A nonischemic approach to partial nephrectomy is optimal. Yes. J Urol 2012;187:387-8. DOI
PubMed
9. Volpe A, Blute ML, Ficarra V, et al. Renal ischemia and function after partial nephrectomy: a collaborative review of the literature.
Eur Urol 2015;68:61-74. DOI PubMed
10. Lane BR, Demirjian S, Derweesh IH, et al. Survival and functional stability in chronic kidney disease due to surgical removal of
nephrons: importance of the new baseline glomerular filtration rate. Eur Urol 2015;68:996-1003. DOI PubMed
11. Campbell SC, Campbell JA, Munoz-Lopez C, Rathi N, Yasuda Y, Attawettayanon W. Every decade counts: a narrative review of
functional recovery after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2023;131:165-72. DOI PubMed PMC
12. Klatte T, Ficarra V, Gratzke C, et al. A literature review of renal surgical anatomy and surgical strategies for partial nephrectomy. Eur
Urol 2015;68:980-92. DOI PubMed PMC
13. Lane BR, Babineau DC, Poggio ED, et al. Factors predicting renal functional outcome after partial nephrectomy. J Urol
2008;180:2363-9. DOI PubMed
14. Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall
survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008;179:468-73. DOI PubMed
15. Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur
Urol 2010;58:340-5. DOI PubMed
16. Zhang Z, Zhao J, Dong W, et al. Acute kidney injury after partial nephrectomy: role of parenchymal mass reduction and ischemia and
impact on subsequent functional recovery. Eur Urol 2016;69:745-52. DOI PubMed
17. Choi KH, Yoon YE, Kim KH, Han WK. Contralateral kidney volume change as a consequence of ipsilateral parenchymal atrophy
promotes overall renal function recovery after partial nephrectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2015;47:25-32. DOI PubMed

