Page 40 - Read Online
P. 40

Parra et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:16  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.01  Page 11 of 13

               of renal function, without forgetting a higher likelihood of complications on those extremely challenging
                   [33]
               cases .
               Nowadays, 2D computed tomography (CT) images can be turned into three-dimensional (3D) models, and
                                                                                           [34]
               3D virtual reconstructions have proven to be useful tools in the surgical planning of PN . Porpiglia et al.
               demonstrated, first in 2017 and then in 2019, the downgrading in complexity in nephrometric scores
               (RENAL  and  PADUA)  using  3D  reconstruction  systems [35,36] . In  2020,  they  evaluated  the  role  of  3D
               virtual reconstructions  in  the  surgical  guidance  during  RAPNs,  proving  that  3D  guidance  was
               associated  with lower  rates  of  ischemia,  higher  rate  of  complete  enucleation  and  lower  collecting
               system damaging rate, compared to intraoperative ultrasound (US) guidance .
                                                                                [37]

               We know that the short follow-up period of our patients may be a limitation of the study and that
               functional outcomes at one year would probably increase the impact. Therefore, future lines of research
               should aim to validate new nomograms with the most important risk factors of the patients in order to
               decide between one technique or another. This will require a longer follow-up time of our patients.

               Another limitation of our study is the small sample size, with only 148 patients included. Despite the
               advances in knowledge about the recovery of renal function and renal ischemia and the fact that
               preservation of renal mass is the most important factor, we can confirm that controversies remain
               unresolved, and the urology community would be enriched by additional investigation with respect to the
               best approaches. This could include a contrast of conventional intraoperative ultrasonography with other
               technologies such as indocyanine green dye, and the better use of preoperative imaging including 3D
               reconstruction to increase surgeons’ knowledge of the patient’s anatomy and the relationships between the
               vessels and the tumor. The different surgical techniques are relevant in this regard: polar nephrectomy,
               enucleation, wedge resection and enucleoresection; their differences imply a greater or lesser preservation of
               renal mass.

               Upcoming studies should also provide information to help the urology community understand when
               irreversible ischemic damage begins to occur with warm ischemia and which patients are at the greatest risk
               of irreversible ischemic damage and impaired renal function.

               In conclusion, even though renal tumors with a higher RENAL score imply the need to perform a longer
               arterial ischemia time, its relationship with the deterioration of renal function is unclear as there are
               probably other factors to blame, such as the patient’s previous comorbidities. Therefore, we believe more in
               assuring oncologic results and promoting the absence of complications during PN. Greater knowledge of
               the importance of the technique will be available in the future with the use of new technologies such as
               robotics and 3D imaging.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Conceptualization, data curation, methodology, writing - original draft, writing - review and editing: de la
               Parra I
               Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing - review and editing: Gómez Rivas J
               Data curation and supervision: Serrano Á
               Data curation: Vives R, Gutiérrez Hidalgo B, Hermida JF, Ibañez L
               Supervision: Fernández Montarroso L, Moreno-Sierra J
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45