Page 46 - Read Online
P. 46

Chandrasekar et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:33  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.12  Page 9 of 16
























































                Figure 4. Diagnostic algorithm for malignant biliary stricture. US: Ultrasonography; CT: computed tomography; MRI/ MRCP: magnetic
                resonance  imaging/magnetic  resonance  cholangiopancreatography;  CBD:  common  bile  duct;  ERCP:  endoscopic  retrograde
                cholangiopancreatography; EUS: endoscopic ultrasound; FNA: fine needle aspiration; IDUS: intraductal ultrasound.


               comparable in efficacy with certain advantages to each technique, but lesser morbidity and patient comfort
               with endoscopic drainage. PTBD is generally reserved when endoscopic biliary drainage fails .
                                                                                             [64]
               ERCP stenting
               Endoscopic stenting has shown to be superior to surgical decompression with a bypass with less morbidity
               and mortality in multiple studies, but the surgical bypass is more durable as endoscopic drainage has a
               higher risk of biliary obstruction requiring repeat procedures [65,66] . Decompression with stenting is
               performed with ERCP and placement of a metal or plastic stent. In general, self-expandable metal stents
               (SEMS) are primarily used for decompression in MBO. Several studies have shown a lower rate of stent
               dysfunction and lower re-intervention rates with SEMS, mainly for extrahepatic tumors with strictures [67,68] .
                                             [69]
               A meta-analysis by Zorrón Pu et al.  showed stent dysfunction rates of 22% for SEMS compared to 47% for
               plastic stents with a stent patency duration of 250 days in comparison to 124 days with plastic stents. Moole
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51