Page 42 - Read Online
P. 42

Chandrasekar et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:33  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.12  Page 5 of 16

               Table 2. Sensitivity and specificity of various modalities in the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures
                                                                 Sensitivity          Specificity
                ERCP with brush cytology                         23%-66%              99%-100%
                ERCP with biliary fluid aspiration               6%-36%               NA
                ERCP with biliary forceps biopsy                 45%-81%              99%-100%
                Intraductal ultrasound                           88%-94%              86%-90%
                Endoscopic ultrasound                            43%-90%              78%-96%
                Spyglass Cholangioscopy                          64%-94%              95%-100%
               ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
































                Figure 1. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography image demonstrating (A) Hilar stricture in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma and (B)
                Stricture in the common hepatic duct in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma.

               higher up in the biliary tree and complications related to tumor bleeding and perforation should be kept in
               mind. Studies have shown varying sensitivity between 50% and 81% for the diagnosis of biliary cancers [30,31] .
                        [32]
               Chen et al.  demonstrated a sensitivity of 53.8% for the diagnosis of pancreato-biliary malignancy from
               biliary strictures, with higher sensitivity for CCA when compared to pancreatic cancer (74% vs. 29%). The
               exact number of biopsies required for diagnosis has been reported to be variable between 1 and 6 in several
               studies. Tamada et al.  showed that infiltrating type biliary malignancies required more bites while 3
                                  [30]
               biopsies were sufficient to increase the sensitivity to near 100% for papillary type CCA. In order to improve
               the sensitivity, the combination of brushings along with biliary forceps biopsy has shown better results. A
               meta-analysis of 9 studies showed the sensitivity for brushings and biopsies to be 45% and 48% respectively
               but their combination improved it to 59% .
                                                  [33]

               Intraductal ultrasonography
               Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) consists of high-frequency catheter probes that can be introduced into
               the CBD over a guidewire most often during ERCP. It is used for the detection of biliary tumors with local
               staging. There are usually three layers visible on IDUS: an inner hyperechoic layer corresponding to the
               mucosa, a middle hypoechoic layer of muscle fibers and an outer hyperechoic layer of connective tissue .
                                                                                                       [34]
               The presence of a hypoechoic mass with disruption of normal ultrasonographic pattern and irregular
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47