Page 42 - Read Online
P. 42

Tschuor et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:72  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.39                                   Page 11 of 12

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Mackay TM, Smits FJ, Latenstein AEJ, Bogte A, Bonsing BA, et al. Impact of nationwide enhanced implementation of best practices in
                   pancreatic cancer care (PACAP-1): a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020;21:334.
               2.   Nagarkatti SS, Sastry AV, Vrochides D, Martinie JB. How i do it: robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2019;23:1672-81.
               3.   Sola R, Kirks RC, Iannitti DA, Vrochides D, Martinie JB. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Vis Surg 2016;2:126.
               4.   Baimas-George M, Watson M, Murphy KJ, Iannitti D, Baker E, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy may offer improved oncologic
                   outcomes over open surgery: a propensity-matched single-institution study. Surg Endosc 2020;34:3644-9.
               5.   Nota CL, Zwart MJ, Fong Y, Hagendoorn J, Hogg ME, et al. Developing a robotic pancreas program: the Dutch experience. J Vis Surg
                   2017;3:106.
               6.   Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F, Costa F, Iacopi S, et al. Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched
                   analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Surg Endosc 2018;32:1234-47.
               7.   Tsamalaidze L, Stauffer JA. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: minimizing the learning curve. J Vis Surg 2018;4:64.
               8.   Vining CC, Hogg ME. How to train and evaluate minimally invasive pancreas surgery. J Surg Oncol 2020;122:41-8.
               9.   Jones LR, Zwart MJW, Molenaar IQ, Koerkamp BG, Hogg ME, et al. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: patient selection, volume criteria,
                   and training programs. Scand J Surg 2020;109:29-33.
               10.  Nassour I, Wang SC, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, Choti MA, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP
                   Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:1784-92.
               11.  Trottman P, Swett K, Shen P, Sirintrapun J. Comparison of standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with radical antegrade
                   modular pancreatosplenectomy. Am Surg 2014;80:295-300.
               12.  Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, et al. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy:
                   identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 2015;150:416-22.
               13.  Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Palanivelu C, Tsung A, Yang K, et al. International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.
                   Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019;8:345-60.
               14.  Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Menonna F, Iacopi S, Lombardo C, et al. A propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus open
                   pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer based on margin status. Surg Endosc 2019;33:234-42.
               15.  Zhao W, Liu C, Li S, Geng D, Feng Y, et al. Safety and efficacy for robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal
                   pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 2018;27:468-78.
               16.  Watkins AA, Kent TS, Gooding WE, Boggi U, Chalikonda S, et al. Multicenter outcomes of robotic reconstruction during the early
                   learning curve for minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2018;20:155-65.
               17.  Baker EH, Ross SW, Seshadri R, Swan RZ, Iannitti DA, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison of complications and cost
                   to the open approach. Int J Med Robot 2016;12:554-60.
               18.  Ielpo B, Caruso R, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, et al. Robotic versus standard open pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis
                   comparison. Updates Surg 2019;71:137-44.
               19.  Liu R, Liu Q, Zhao ZM, Tan XL, Gao YX, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study. J
                   Surg Oncol 2017;116:461-9.
               20.  Liu R, Zhao GD, Tang WB, Zhang K, Zhao ZM, et al. A single-team experience with robotic pancreatic surgery in 1010 cases. Nan Fang
                   Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2018;38:130-4. (in Chinese)
               21.  Souche R, Herrero A, Bourel G, Chauvat J, Pirlet I, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-
                   center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 2018;32:3562-9.
               22.  Qu L, Zhiming Z, Xianglong T, Yuanxing G, Yong X, et al. Short- and mid- term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal
                   pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective propensity score-matched study. Int J Surg 2018;55:81-6.
               23.  Kim HS, Han Y, Kang JS, Kim H, Kim JR, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between open and robot-assisted minimally invasive
                   pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018;25:142-9.
               24.  Lyman WB, Passeri M, Sastry A, Cochran A, Iannitti DA, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-
                   volume, minimally invasive center. Surg Endosc 2019;33:2991-3000.
               25.  Kornaropoulos M, Moris D, Beal EW, Makris MC, Mitrousias A, et al. Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of
                   the literature. Surg Endosc 2017;31:4382-92.
               26.  McMillan MT, Zureikat AH, Hogg ME, Kowalsky SJ, Zeh HJ, et al. A propensity score-matched analysis of robotic vs open
                   pancreatoduodenectomy on incidence of pancreatic fistula. JAMA Surg 2017;152:327-35.
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47