Page 16 - Read Online
P. 16

Page 6 of 7                                          M’Harzi et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2019;3:27  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.22

                                                                                                        [8]
               group prompts us to now evaluate OAGB and its consequences using 30-week and 50-week follow-ups
               and compare these results to EJ surgeries (control group).


               On the day of sacrifices, histology and molecular analysis on esophageal and gastric mucosae can be
                                                             [5]
               performed to analyze the prevalence of BE and cancer .

               Concerning the esophagus, the absence of metaplasia, dysplasia or cancer in the OAGB group compared
               with the EJ group will suggest confer a real protective effect of the long gastric tube used in the OAGB
               model. Conversely, the presence of precancerous or cancerous lesions in the esogastric blocs of OAGB rats
               gives additional arguments to detractors of the technique to decrease its diffusion.

               This short communication is a simple contribution for researchers interested in the topic of biliary reflux
               after OAGB because there is an urgent need to answer this specific issue, especially for patients who have
               already undergone surgery.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               We thank the assistance of INSERM U970, ERI in the study.

               Authors’ contributions
               Project development: Bruzzi M, Chevallier JM, Douard R
               Surgery and data Collection: M’Harzi L, Bruzzi M
               Wrote the manuscript: M’Harzi L, Bruzzi M
               Comment: Chevallier JM, Douard R

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All
               experiments were performed in compliance with the European Community guidelines and approved by
               the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.

               REFERENCES
               1.   Deitel M. Letter to the editor: bariatric surgery worldwide 2013 reveals a rise in mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2015;25:2166-8.
               2.   Mahawar KK, Kumar P, Carr WR, Jennings N, Schroeder N, et al. Current status of mini-gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg
                   2016;12:305-10.
               3.   Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg 2001;11:276-80.
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21