Page 69 - Read Online

Page 12 of 12 Hambright et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:19 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.08

lymph nodes in esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;152:546-54. DOI PubMed PMC
20. Rahouma M, Baudo M, Mynard N, et al. Volume outcome relationship in postesophagectomy leak: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. Int J Surg 2024;110:2349-54. DOI PubMed PMC
21. Walsh TN. The esophagogastric anastomosis: the importance of anchoring sutures in reducing anastomotic leak rates. Ann Surg Open
2023;4:e231. DOI PubMed PMC
22. Wang L, Milman S, Ng T. Performance of the transoral circular stapler for oesophagogastrectomy after induction therapy. Interact
Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2019;29:890-6. DOI PubMed
23. Lin H, Liang G, Chai H, Liao Y, Zhang C, Cheng Y. Comparison of two circular-stapled techniques for esophageal cancer: a
propensity-matched analysis. Front Oncol 2021;11:759599. DOI PubMed PMC
24. Caso R, Wee JO. Esophagogastric anastomotic techniques for minimally invasive and robotic Ivor Lewis operations. Oper Tech
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;25:105-23. DOI
25. Okuyama M, Motoyama S, Suzuki H, Saito R, Maruyama K, Ogawa J. Hand-sewn cervical anastomosis versus stapled intrathoracic
anastomosis after esophagectomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg
Today 2007;37:947-52. DOI PubMed
26. Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S, et al. Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J
Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:1287-95. DOI PubMed
27. Harustiak T, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Stolz A, Lischke R. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled
intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:1650-
9. DOI PubMed
28. Kamarajah SK, Bundred JR, Singh P, Pasquali S, Griffiths EA. Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy:
systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJS Open 2020;4:563-76. DOI PubMed PMC
29. Zhang H, Wang Z, Zheng Y, et al. Robotic side-to-side and end-to-side stapled esophagogastric anastomosis of Ivor Lewis
esophagectomy for cancer. World J Surg 2019;43:3074-82. DOI PubMed
30. Schröder W, Raptis DA, Schmidt HM, et al. Anastomotic techniques and associated morbidity in total minimally invasive
transthoracic esophagectomy: results from the EsoBenchmark Database. Ann Surg 2019;270:820-6. DOI PubMed
31. Tagkalos E, van der Sluis PC, Uzun E, et al. The circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis in esophagectomy: no differences in
anastomotic insufficiency and stricture rates between the 25 mm and 28 mm circular stapler. J Gastrointest Surg 2021;25:2242-9. DOI
PubMed PMC
32. Feingold PL, Bryan DS, Kuckelman J, et al. Anastomotic stricture after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg
2023;116:712-9. DOI PubMed
33. Cerfolio RJ, Wei B, Hawn MT, Minnich DJ. Robotic esophagectomy for cancer: early results and lessons learned. Semin Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 2016;28:160-9. DOI PubMed
34. Slagter R. Slagter - Drawing visible and palpable surface anatomy thorax and abdomen - no labels. license: Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. Available from: https://anatomytool.org/content/slagter-drawing-visible-and-palpable-
surface-anatomy-thorax-and-abdomen-no-labels. [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2024].
35. Baltensweiler N, Lataster A, Herrler A. Lateral view of thorax with lung, skin, ribs and shoulder blade. © Nadja Baltensweiler and
Ned. Anatomen Vereniging, license: CC BY-NC-SA. Available from: https://anatomytool.org/content/lateral-view-thorax-lung-skin-
ribs-and-shoulder-blade. [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2024].