Page 68 - Read Online
P. 68

Hambright et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:19  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.08  Page 11 of 12

               Conflicts of interest
               Both authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2024.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with
                   oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:1887-92.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Gottlieb-Vedi E, Kauppila JH, Malietzis G, Nilsson M, Markar SR, Lagergren J. Long-term survival in esophageal cancer after
                   minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2019;270:1005-17.  DOI
                   PubMed
               3.       Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al. Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg
                   Endosc 2002;16:1790-2.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus
                   open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial). Trials 2012;13:230.
                   DOI  PubMed  PMC
               5.       de Groot EM, van der Horst S, Kingma BF, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open
                   esophagectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Dis Esophagus 2020;33:doaa079.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Esagian SM, Ziogas IA, Skarentzos K, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for
                   esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers 2022;14:3177.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               7.       Jin D, Yao L, Yu J, et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: a meta-
                   analysis and systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2019;15:e1988.  DOI  PubMed
               8.       Zhu DS, Cao JW, Geng MF, et al. Wide gastric conduit increases the risk of benign anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. Am
                   Surg 2020;86:621-7.  DOI  PubMed
               9.       Shen Y, Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, Wang Q. The effect of narrowed gastric conduits on anastomotic leakage following minimally
                   invasive oesophagectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014;19:263-8.  DOI  PubMed
               10.      Zhen F, Shi S, Xue L, Liu J, Luo J. [Study on the association of gastric conduit width and postoperative early delayed gastric emptying
                   in middle-lower esophageal cancer patients undergoing Ivor-Lewis procedure]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2016;19:985-9.
                   (in Chinese).  PubMed
               11.      Moody ED, Viskari PJ, Colyer CL. Non-covalent labeling of human serum albumin with indocyanine green: a study by capillary
                   electrophoresis with diode laser-induced fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1999;729:55-64.  DOI  PubMed
               12.      Okusanya OT, Hess NR, Luketich JD, Sarkaria IS. Infrared intraoperative fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green in thoracic
                   surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;53:512-8.  DOI  PubMed
               13.      Pather K, Deladisma AM, Guerrier C, Kriley IR, Awad ZT. Indocyanine green perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit in
                   minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2022;36:896-903.  DOI  PubMed
               14.      Slooter MD, Eshuis WJ, Cuesta MA, Gisbertz SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Fluorescent imaging using indocyanine green during
                   esophagectomy to prevent surgical morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:S755-65.  DOI  PubMed
                   PMC
               15.      Casas MA, Angeramo CA, Bras Harriott C, Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for
                   prevention of anastomotic leak in totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis
                   Esophagus 2022;35:doab056.  DOI  PubMed
               16.      Banks K, Hung Y, Santos J, et al. Outcomes and predictive value of anastomotic evaluation using indocyanine green fluorescence
                   during minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surgeons 2023;236:S115-6.  DOI
               17.      de Groot EM, Kuiper GM, van der Veen A, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy
                   with intrathoracic anastomosis: a prospective study. Updates Surg 2023;75:409-18.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               18.      LeBlanc G, Takahashi C, Huston J, Shridhar R, Meredith K. The use of indocyanine green (ICYG) angiography intraoperatively to
                   evaluate gastric conduit perfusion during esophagectomy: does it impact surgical decision-making? Surg Endosc 2023;37:8720-7.
                   DOI  PubMed
               19.      Hachey KJ, Gilmore DM, Armstrong KW, et al. Safety and feasibility of near-infrared image-guided lymphatic mapping of regional
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73