Page 51 - Read Online
P. 51

Lesch et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:20  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.24  Page 7 of 8

               CONCLUSION
               Secure closure of median abdominal wall incisions is achievable with sutures regardless of small or large bite
               technique and material thickness. But as can be seen from the GRIP/CRIP concept, larger defects require
               more complex reconstruction. For larger defects, suture closure alone may not be sufficient, depending on
               the circumstances. A larger impact area, for example, lowers the durability. This experimental study
               revealed that Monomax® sutures provide a higher level of closure security than PDS® sutures. The thickness
               of the suture showed no difference. It is advisable to choose the safest suture technique and mesh
               reinforcement in larger abdominal wall defects.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               We thank the financial support by the Heidelberger Stiftung Chirurgie (grants 2016/ 22, 2017/ 171, 2018/
               215, 2019/ 288, 2020/ 376, and 2021/ 444).

               Authors’ contributions
               Performed the data analysis and wrote the article: Lesch C
               Performed the experiments: Kugel F, Uhr K
               Lead the construction of the bench test and its maintenance: Vollmer M
               Contributed important thoughts and discussions for the construction of the experiments and the paper:
               Nessel R
               Closely guided the execution of the experiments, designed parts of the experiments, and continuously
               supervised the paper: Kallinowski F
               Designed parts of the experiments and proofread the paper: Fortelny RH


               Availability of data and materials
               The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without
               reservation.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               We thank the financial support by the Heidelberger Stiftung Chirurgie (grants 2016/ 22, 2017/ 171, 2018/
               215, 2019/ 288, 2020/ 376, and 2021/ 444).
               Disclaimer FK received financial and material support from Baxter, Becton Dickinson, Corza, Dahlhausen,
               Ethicon, FEG, GEM, Medtronic, Olympus, and PFM medical based on a Third-Party-Funding-Agreement
               with the Heidelberg University and / or with Asklepios proresearch. Fortelny RH. Received speaker's
               honorarium  by  B.Braun,  Becton  Dickinsin,  and  Medtronic  and  research  grants  by  the  Wiener
               Gesundheitsverbund, Klinik Ottakring, 523403.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               The research was conducted after building a bench test for low cyclic loading of tissues. Human material
               was not used. Accordingly, no informed consent from patients was required. The ethical approval to use
               animal tissues was given by local authorities according to European law with the permission DE 08 221
               1018.

               Consent for publication
                Not applicable.


               Copyright
                © The Author(s) 2023.
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56