Page 48 - Read Online
P. 48

Page 180                 Pavan et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2021;5:173-81  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2021.18

               supported by reliable and precise test able to define an upgrading or upstaging of PCa. The reduction of
               costs associated to unnecessary treatment will be devolved for more precise screening and diagnosis able to
               improve the quality of life of our patients.


               Some of the biomarkers are candidates for identifying more aggressive forms such as HOXD8rc, CXCL14,
               SLC16A5rc and GRASP or to predict progression such as DOCKK2, HAPLN3 and FBXO30. It is important
                                                                                                       [14]
               to note that methylation of some biomarkers that can be found in tissues, cannot be found in ctDNA .
               This is because PCa does not release cancer cells if it is at the early stages. Thus, the analysis of cfDNA
               methylation associated to the study of PCa tissues, remains a very important task to deepen the role of
               cfDNA biomarkers methylation.


               In conclusion the studies showed the possibility to analyze the methylation of cfDNA biomarkers either
               from plasma or urine, thus opening more possibilities to monitor PCa patients and, possibly to develop
               screening programs. A challenge is to study the integration of the anamnestic data, the PSA and the
               molecular methylation status on cfDNA to personalize the patient’s care.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception, data search, design and writing of the review: Pavan N,
               Scaggiante B
               Performed critical revision: Grassi G


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;69:7-34.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Goering W, Kloth M, Schulz WA. DNA methylation changes in prostate cancer. In: Dumitrescu RG, Verma M, editors. Cancer
                   epigenetics. Totowa: Humana Press; 2012. p. 47-66.
               3.       Sobhani N, Sirico M, Generali D, Zanconati F, Scaggiante B. Circulating cell-free nucleic acids as prognostic and therapy predictive
                   tools for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2020;11:450-63.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               4.       Brikun I, Nusskern D, Freije D. An expanded biomarker panel for the detection of prostate cancer from urine DNA. Exp Hematol
                   Oncol 2019;8:13.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               5.       Brikun I, Nusskern D, Decatus A, Harvey E, Li L, Freije D. A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer
                   from FV and DRE urine DNA. Clin Epigenetics 2018;10:91.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               6.       Nekrasov KA, Vikarchuk MV, Rudenko EE, et al. 6-gene promoter methylation assay is potentially applicable for prostate cancer
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53