Page 49 - Read Online
P. 49

Page 121                                        Waller et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2021;5:112-23  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2021.09

               As in all family-based genetic studies, our results could be sensitive to inaccurate pedigree structures.
               However, relationship and ethnicity checks are standard protocols and mitigate the possibility of error.
               Another limitation to this study is the observational nature. Additional functional studies will be required
               to describe causation and characterize the mechanisms involved in these loci and myeloma risk.

               We have identified several novel loci that segregate in at least two myeloma HRPs. These loci are likely to
               harbor genes and rare risk variants for MM and are compelling new targets for inherited risk to MM.

               In conclusion, we developed a novel strategy for gene mapping in complex traits that uses multiple large
               high-risk pedigrees. The approach is robust to heterogeneity both within and between pedigrees and
               formally corrects for multiple testing to allow for statistically rigorous discovery. We applied this strategy to
               MM, a complex cancer of plasma cells, and identified one novel genome-wide significant locus at 18q21.33
               and 13 suggestive loci. Our study offers a new technique for gene mapping and demonstrates its utility to
               narrow the search for risk variants in complex traits.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               We thank the participants and their families who make this research possible. Data collection was made
               possible, in part, by the Utah Population Database and the Utah Cancer Registry. Computations were
               supported by the University of Utah’s Center for High-Performance Computing.


               Authors’ contributions
               Designed the study and wrote the manuscript: Waller RG, Camp NJ
               Contributed to the duo-SGS method development: Waller RG, Madsen MJ, Gardner J, Camp NJ
               Provided analysis support and edited the manuscript: Madsen MJ, Gardner J
               Provided clinical support and reviewed the manuscript: Sborov DW
               Generated figures and tables: Waller RG


               Availability of data and materials
               The Shared Genome Segment (SGS) analysis software is freely available and can be accessed online: https://
               uofuhealth.utah.edu/huntsman/labs/camp/analysis-tool/shared-genomic-segment.php. Data used in the
               duo-SGS analysis includes pedigree structures, myeloma diagnoses, and genome-wide SNP genotypes.
               Pedigree structures necessary for these analyses were acquired from the Utah Population Database (UPDB).
               These are considered potentially identifiable by the Resource for Genetic and Epidemiologic Research
               (RGE) - the ethical oversight committee for the UPDB. As a result, access to these data requires review by
               the RGE committee (contact Jahn Barlow, jahn.barlow@utah.edu). Upon RGE approval, we will provide the
               genotypes and pedigree structure in a format ready to be used by the SGS software.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National
               Institutes of Health under Award Number F99CA234943 and K00CA234943. The content is solely the
               responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes
               of Health. Methodological development of the duo-SGS method was supported by the University of Utah’s
               Center for Genomic Medicine. This research was supported by the Utah Cancer Registry, which is funded
               by the National Cancer Institute’s SEER Program, Contract No. HHSN261201800016I, the US Center
               for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries, Cooperative Agreement
               No. NU58DP0063200, with additional support from the University of Utah and the Huntsman Cancer
               Foundation. Partial support for all datasets within the Utah Population Database is provided by the
               University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, and the Huntsman Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54