Page 31 - Read Online
P. 31

Brault et al. J Transl Genet Genom. 2025;9:1-10  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2024.83  Page 5

               Table 1. Variance of ATP levels and ADP/ATP ratio measurements in diverse BTHS model systems
                Species ATP level  ADP/ATP Genetic alteration  Tafazzin protein  Cell type/organ  Reference
                In vitro cell culture models
                                            517delG  328T>C
                Human  Down     NR       TAZ   , TAZ   patients   NR        iPSC-derived CMs     [70]
                                            G197E  I209D
                Human  Up       Unchanged  TAZ  , TAZ   patients  None      lymphoblasts         [68]
                Human  Down     NR       BTHS patients       None           lymphocytes          [69]
                Human  Down     NR       shTAZ knock-down    Reduced wt TAZ  HeLa cervical cancer   [50]
                Human  Down     NR       TAZ 170G>T , TAZ 140-152del13  NR  Fibroblasts          [73]
                                           KD
                Mouse  Down     NR       Taz  knock-down     Reduced wt TAZ  C2C12 skeletal muscle  [60]
                Mouse  Up       NR       Taz G193V  knock-in  None          CMs                  [53]
                                           KO
                Mouse  Up       NR       Taz  knock-out      None           MEFs                 [53]
                Rat    Down     NR       shTaz knock-down    Reduced wt Taz  Neonatal ventricle CMs  [60,71]
                Rat    Down     NR       shTaz knock-down    Reduced wt Taz  Neonatal ventricle fibroblasts  [72]
                Rat    Unchanged  NR     Taz knock-out       None           C6 glioma cells      [74]
                                         Δ
                Yeast  Unchanged   NR     taz1 knock-out     None           S. cerevisiae        [75]
                In vivo organs
                Human  NR       Up*      BTHS (n = 6-14) patients   NR      Adult, juvenile hearts  [8]
                Human   NR      Down*    BTHS (n = 6-14) patients   NR      Adult, juvenile calf muscle  [8]
                Mouse  Unchanged  Unchanged  Taz D57H  knock-in  Mutant Taz present  Juvenile ventricles  [42]
                                           D57H
                Mouse  Down     Up       Taz   knock-in      Mutant Taz present  Adult ventricles  [42]
               NR: Not reported; wt: wild-type; *Calculated from PCr/ATP ratio in vivo.


               BTHS patients
               Given there is only a small number of BTHS patients, the difficulty in obtaining tissue samples from
               patients with growth insufficiency, and the high incidence of stillbirths and prenatal loss that are associated
               with BTHS , it is not surprising there are no direct measures of the energetic state in heart or skeletal
                         [80]
               muscle of BTHS patients. However, non-invasive MRS has been used to measure PCr and Pi in heart and
               skeletal muscle [8,81] . This technique does not provide absolute quantification; instead, ADP and Pi are
               calculated using the CK equilibrium constant , assuming that ATP content is normal. In the hearts of both
                                                     [14]
               children and adults with BTHS, the [PCr]/[ATP] ratio is lower, suggesting that the ADP/ATP ratio is
               increased, i.e., a worse energetic state [8,81] . In resting skeletal muscle, in children (and a trend in adults), the
               relative [PCr]/[ATP] was greater, suggesting that the ADP/ATP ratio is decreased, i.e., an improved
               energetic state . The finding of opposite directional changes in the ADP/ATP ratio in heart and skeletal
                           [8]
               muscle of the same BTHS patients supports the notion that loss of cardiolipin does not result in a
               predictable change in energetic state. Instead, it depends on other factors influencing cellular energetics,
               such as substrate supply, tissue type, oxygenation, and energy demand (e.g., muscle contractions).


                                                                                                      [82]
               Clinically, this might be important given the recent targeting of BTHS mitochondria with elamipretide . It
               has been shown that in vivo mitochondrial ATP production is improved in older adult skeletal muscle after
               a single dose of elamipretide in a randomized trial . Elamipretide, an aromatic, cationic tetrapeptide,
                                                            [83]
               works by localizing to the inner membrane, where it binds to cardiolipin to enhance membrane stability and
               ATP synthesis in several organs, including the heart . Encouraging clinical results observed that
                                                                [84]
               elamipretide increases mitochondrial respiration, improves electron transport chain function and ATP
               production, and reduces pathogenic ROS production. Currently, it is unclear whether functional benefit is
               achieved through an improvement of ATP or ADP/ATP ratio, an interruption of damaging oxidative stress,
               or other unidentified factors. Since elamipretide binds to and stabilizes cardiolipin, it would be intriguing to
               test whether elamipretide may function through other mechanisms by comparing treatment in the patient-
               tailored point mutant Taz D75H  knock-in  versus a Taz  knock-out  mice. Taken together, further studies
                                                                        [77]
                                                             KO
                                                [42]
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36