Page 33 - Read Online
P. 33

Page 26                                                             Xu et al. J Surveill Secur Saf 2020;1:16-33  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jsss.2020.04

               Table 1. Number of manual statistical samples of regional invasive behavior
                          V1     V2      V3     V4      V5     V6      V7     V8      V9     V10    Total
                Abnormal  14     8       26     12      17     8       8      5       18      8      124
                Normal    3      8       0      5       5      3       3      0       3       3      33

               Table 2. Number of manual statistical samples of trailing behavior
                          F1     F2      F3     F4      F5     F6      F7      F8     F9     F10    Total
                Abnormal  6      8       14      11     8       3      2       3      8       5      68
                Normal    3      5       5       6      2       3      0       3      0       3      30


               Table 3. Number of manual statistical samples of defamation behavior
                          T1     T2      T3     T4      T5     T6      T7     T8      T9     T10    Total
                Abnormal  8       6      11      3      2       5      8       9       6      12      70
                Normal    6       2      5       0      2       3      5       5       3      2       33






















               Figure 8. Identification of illegal intrusion crimes

               In the detection of regional intrusion behavior, the algorithm does not use actual coordinates, but directly
               judges according to pixel coordinates. Therefore, there is no difference between the algorithm and the
               traditional algorithm in the abnormal behavior analysis stage. However, because the algorithm in this
               paper is better than the traditional algorithm in the target detection and target tracking stage, the false
               negative rate of the algorithm is greatly reduced, and finally higher accuracy is achieved. For the analysis
               of the video with false positives, it is easy to have false positives in the following cases: Pedestrians walk
               outside the edge of the surveillance area, and the feet do not enter the surveillance area but are closer to the
               boundary of the surveillance area, as shown in Figure 8.

               One key to detecting trailing behavior is the setting of the relative distance and relative distance threshold
               between two pedestrians. The traditional algorithm is processed based on the pixel coordinate trajectory,
               thus the relative distance and the distance threshold can only be calculated by the number of pixel points,
               which is only an estimated value and is not accurate. However, the proposed algorithm is based on the
               actual coordinate trajectory, and the actual distance between the targets can be calculated, which is used
               as the distance threshold. In the test, the distance threshold of the algorithm was T  = 1000 cm, and the
                                                                                        d
               distance threshold of the traditional algorithm was T  = 100 pixels, as shown in Figure 9.
                                                            d
               Awkward behavior is a relatively complex behavior that requires not only the calculation of the speed of
               pedestrian movement, but also the calculation of the angle of pedestrian movement. While the traditional
               algorithm is based on the pixel coordinate trajectory, the proposed algorithm is based on the actual
               coordinate trajectory [Figure 10].
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38