Page 263 - Read Online
P. 263
Page 28 of 29 Liu et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2026, 6, 18
30. Lv, S.; Peng, L.; Wu, W.; Yao, Y.; Jiao, S.; Hu, W. Bridging language models and computational materials science: a prompt‐driven
framework for material property prediction. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2025, 3, e70013. DOI
31. Shang, Y.; Xiong, Z.; An, K.; Hauch, J. A.; Brabec, C. J.; Li, N. Materials genome engineering accelerates the research and development
of organic and perovskite photovoltaics. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2024, 2, e28. DOI
32. Xu, D.; Zhang, Q.; Huo, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, M. Advances in data‐assisted high‐throughput computations for material design. Mater.
Genome. Eng. Adv. 2023, 1, e11. DOI
33. Liu, Z. Computational thermodynamics and its applications. Acta. Mater. 2020, 200, 745-92. DOI
34. Wang, W. Y.; Li, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, Z. Integrated computational materials engineering for advanced materials: a brief review. Comput.
Mater. Sci. 2019, 158, 42-8. DOI
35. Li, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, M.; et al. Symbolic regression accelerates the discovery of quantitative relationships in rubber material aging. J.
Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 29. DOI
36. Pan, J.; Shi, R.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Composition-deformation mechanism-property machine learning model for strength-ductility
improvement of β-type titanium alloys. Int. J. Plast. 2025, 194, 104461. DOI
37. Zou, C.; Li, J.; Wang, W. Y.; et al. Integrating data mining and machine learning to discover high-strength ductile titanium alloys. Acta.
Mater. 2021, 202, 211-21. DOI
38. Tan, Y.; Dong, R.; Duan, Z.; Li, H.; Hou, H.; Zhao, Y. Machine learning coupled with an improved exhaustive method-assisted design
of a low cost Ti-Al-Cr-Fe-Si series titanium alloy. Mater. Design. 2025, 257, 114526. DOI
39. Liu, X.; Niu, H.; Zhao, S.; et al. Microstructural evolution and prediction of TC18 titanium alloys by high-throughput technology and
machine learning. J. Alloys. Compd. 2025, 1017, 179202. DOI
40. Zhan, Z.; Hu, W.; Meng, Q. Data-driven fatigue life prediction in additive manufactured titanium alloy: a damage mechanics based
machine learning framework. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2021, 252, 107850. DOI
41. Paturi, U. M. R.; Palakurthy, S. T.; Cheruku, S.; Vidhya Darshini, B.; Reddy, N. Role of machine learning in additive manufacturing of
titanium alloys - a review. Arch. Computat. Methods. Eng. 2023, 30, 5053-69. DOI
42. Lu, T.; Li, M.; Lu, W.; Zhang, T. Recent progress in the data-driven discovery of novel photovoltaic materials. J. Mater. Inf. 2022, 2, 7.
DOI
43. Shi, B.; Lookman, T.; Xue, D. Multi‐objective optimization and its application in materials science. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2023, 1,
e14. DOI
44. Zhou, C.; Yin, G.; Hu, X. Multi-objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: artificial neural networks and
genetic algorithm approach. Mater. Design. 2009, 30, 1209-15. DOI
45. Ashby, M. Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection. Acta. Mater. 2000, 48, 359-69. DOI
46. Ashjari, M.; Khoshravan, M. R. Multi-objective optimization of a functionally graded sandwich panel under mechanical loading in the
presence of stress constraint. J. Mech. Behav. Mater. 2017, 26, 79-93. DOI
47. Hwang, Y.; Lim, D. Y. Dual cone gradient descent for training physics-informed neural networks. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2409.18426.
Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.18426. (accessed 24 Mar 2026).
48. Malashin, I.; Tynchenko, V.; Gantimurov, A.; Nelyub, V.; Borodulin, A. A multi-objective optimization of neural networks for
predicting the physical properties of textile polymer composite materials. Polymers 2024, 16, 1752. DOI PubMed PMC
49. Liu, Q.; Chu, M.; Thuerey, N. ConFIG: towards conflict-free training of physics informed neural networks. arXiv 2024,
arXiv:2408.11104. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.11104. (accessed 24 Mar 2026).
50. Sidhu, S. S.; Singh, H.; Gepreel, M. A. A review on alloy design, biological response, and strengthening of β-titanium alloys as
biomaterials. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 121, 111661. DOI PubMed
51. Zou, H.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, L.; et al. Integrating machine learning and CALPHAD method for exploring low‐modulus near‐β‐Ti alloys.
Rare. Met. 2024, 43, 309-23. DOI
52. Chen, C.; Zuo, Y.; Ye, W.; Li, X.; Deng, Z.; Ong, S. P. A critical review of machine learning of energy materials. Adv. Energy. Mater.
2020, 10, 1903242. DOI
53. Deringer, V. L.; Caro, M. A.; Csányi, G. Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science. Adv. Mater.
2019, 31, e1902765. DOI PubMed
54. Schmidt, J.; Marques, M. R. G.; Botti, S.; Marques, M. A. L. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state
materials science. npj. Comput. Mater. 2019, 5, 221. DOI
55. Zhang, Y.; Ren, K.; Wang, W. Y.; et al. Discovering the ultralow thermal conductive A 2 B 2 O 7 -type high-entropy oxides through the
hybrid knowledge-assisted data-driven machine learning. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2024, 168, 131-42. DOI
56. Yang, Y.; Yang, S.; Wang, H. Effects of microstructure on the evolution of dynamic damage of Fe 50 Mn 30 Co 10 Cr 10 high entropy alloy.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2021, 802, 140440. DOI
