Page 222 - Read Online
P. 222
Wang et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2026, 6, 16 Page 25 of 25
85. Howard, A. A.; Perego, M.; Karniadakis, G. E.; Stinis, P. Multifidelity deep operator networks for data-driven and physics-informed
problems. J. Comput. Phys. 2023, 493, 112462. DOI
86. Motamed, M. A multi-fidelity neural network surrogate sampling method for uncertainty quantification. arXiv 2020, arXiv:1909.01859.
Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01859 (accessed 26 March 2026).
87. Song, D. H.; Tartakovsky, D. M. Transfer Learning on Multi-Fidelity Data. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2105.00856. Available online: https://arxi
v.org/abs/2105.00856 (accessed 26 March 2026).
88. Chakraborty, S. Transfer learning based multi-fidelity physics informed deep neural network. J. Comput. Phys. 2021, 426, 109942. DOI
89. Snapp, K. L.; Silverman, S.; Pang, R.; et al. A physics-informed impact model refined by multi-fidelity transfer learning. Extreme.
Mechanics. Letters. 2024, 72, 102223. DOI
90. Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Liu, K.; Li, Y. A physics-informed neural network approach to fatigue life prediction using small quantity of samples.
Int. J. Fatigue. 2023, 166, 107270. DOI
91. Islam, M.; Thakur, M. S. H.; Mojumder, S.; Hasan, M. N. Extraction of material properties through multi-fidelity deep learning from
molecular dynamics simulation. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2021, 188, 110187. DOI
92. Liu, B.; Yang, Y.; Wang, G.; Li, Y. A method for calculating residual strength of crack arrest hole on tungsten-copper functionally
graded materials by phase-field gradient element combined with multi-fidelity neural network. Materials 2025, 18, 1973. DOI PubMed
PMC
93. De Breuck P, Heymans G, Rignanese G. Accurate experimental band gap predictions with multifidelity correction learning. J. Mater. Inf.
2022, 2, 10. DOI
94. Cleeman, J.; Agrawala, K.; Nastarowicz, E.; Malhotra, R. Partial-physics-informed multi-fidelity modeling of manufacturing processes.
J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2023, 320, 118125. DOI
95. Khatamsaz, D.; Molkeri, A.; Couperthwaite, R.; et al. Adaptive active subspace-based efficient multifidelity materials design. Mater.
Des. 2021, 209, 110001. DOI
96. Hernández-García, A.; Saxena, N.; Jain, M.; Liu, C. H.; Bengio, Y. Multi-Fidelity Active Learning with GFlowNets. 2024. https://openre
view.net/forum?id=dLaazW9zuF (accessed 2026-03-26).
97. Koutsourelakis, P. Accurate uncertainty quantification using inaccurate computational models. SIAM. J. Sci. Comput. 2009, 31,
3274-300. DOI
98. Wang, Z.; Liu, X.; Chen, H.; Yang, T.; He, Y. Exploring multi-fidelity data in materials science: challenges, applications, and optimized
learning strategies. Applied. Sciences. 2023, 13, 13176. DOI
99. Greenman, K. P.; Green, W. H.; Gómez-Bombarelli, R. Multi-fidelity prediction of molecular optical peaks with deep learning. Chem.
Sci. 2022, 13, 1152-62. DOI PubMed PMC
100. Burdick, R. K.; Borror, C. M.; Montgomery, D. C. A review of methods for measurement systems capability analysis. J. Qual. Technol.
2018, 35, 342-54. DOI
101. Giannoukou, K.; Marelli, S.; Sudret, B. Uncertainty-aware multi-fidelity surrogate modeling with noisy data. arXiv 2024,
arXiv:2401.06447. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06447 (accessed 26 March 2026).
102. Konomi, B. A.; Karagiannis, G. Bayesian analysis of multifidelity computer models with local features and non-nested experimental
designs: application to the WRF model. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1910.08063. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08063 (accessed 26
March 2026).
103. Zhou, Q.; Wu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Hu, J.; Jin, P. A generalized hierarchical co-Kriging model for multi-fidelity data fusion. Struct. Multidisc.
Optim. 2020, 62, 1885-904. DOI
104. Rasmussen, CE.; Williams, CKI. Gaussian processes for machine learning; The MIT Press, 2005. DOI
105. Maldonado, S.; Borthwick, A. G. L. Quasi-two-layer morphodynamic model for bedload-dominated problems: bed slope-induced
morphological diffusion. R. Soc. Open. Sci. 2018, 5, 172018. DOI PubMed PMC
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and
contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of OAE and/or the editor(s). OAE and/or the editor(s) disclaim any responsibility for harm to
persons or property resulting from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products mentioned in the content.
© The Author(s) 2026. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and
reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
