Page 220 - Read Online
P. 220
Wang et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2026, 6, 16 Page 23 of 25
32. Pilania, G.; Gubernatis, J.; Lookman, T. Multi-fidelity machine learning models for accurate bandgap predictions of solids. Comput.
Mater. Sci. 2017, 129, 156-63. DOI
33. Egorova, O.; Hafizi, R.; Woods, D. C.; Day, G. M. Multifidelity statistical machine learning for molecular crystal structure prediction. J.
Phys. Chem. A. 2020, 124, 8065-78. DOI PubMed
34. Batra, R.; Pilania, G.; Uberuaga, B. P.; Ramprasad, R. Multifidelity information fusion with machine learning: a case study of dopant
formation energies in hafnia. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019, 11, 24906-18. DOI PubMed
35. Jha, D.; Choudhary, K.; Tavazza, F.; et al. Enhancing materials property prediction by leveraging computational and experimental data
using deep transfer learning. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5316. DOI PubMed PMC
36. Peng, B.; Zhang, M.; Ye, D. DIC/DSI based studies on the local mechanical behaviors of HR3C/T92 dissimilar welded joint during
plastic deformation. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2022, 857, 144073. DOI
37. Valladares, H.; Li, T.; Zhu, L.; et al. Gaussian process-based prognostics of lithium-ion batteries and design optimization of cathode
active materials. J. Power. Sources. 2022, 528, 231026. DOI
38. Lindsey, R. K.; Bastea, S.; Hamel, S.; Lyu, Y.; Goldman, N.; Lordi, V. ChIMES carbon 2.0: a transferable machine-learned interatomic
model harnessing multifidelity training data. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 26. DOI
39. Ko, T. W.; Ong, S. P. Data-efficient construction of high-fidelity graph deep learning interatomic potentials. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025,
11, 65. DOI
40. Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; et al. Data-efficient multifidelity training for high-fidelity machine learning interatomic potentials. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 1042-54. DOI PubMed
41. Perdikaris, P.; Raissi, M.; Damianou, A.; Lawrence, N. D.; Karniadakis, G. E. Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient
multi-fidelity modelling. Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2017, 473, 20160751. DOI PubMed PMC
42. Liu, M.; Gopakumar, A.; Hegde, V. I.; He, J.; Wolverton, C. High-throughput hybrid-functional DFT calculations of bandgaps and
formation energies and multifidelity learning with uncertainty quantification. Phys. Rev. Materials. 2024, 8, 043803. DOI
43. Yang, Z.; Zou, J.; Huang, L.; et al. Machine learning-based extraction of mechanical properties from multi-fidelity small punch test data.
Adv. Manuf. 2025, 13, 511-24. DOI
44. Yi, J.; Ferreira, B. P.; Bessa, M. A. Single-to-multi-fidelity history-dependent learning with uncertainty quantification and
disentanglement: application to data-driven constitutive modeling. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2026, 448, 118479. DOI
45. Yi, J.; Cheng, J.; Bessa, M. A. Practical multi-fidelity machine learning: fusion of deterministic and Bayesian models. arXiv 2025,
arXiv:2407.15110. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15110 (accessed 26 March 2026).
46. Cheng, M.; Jiang, P.; Hu, J.; Shu, L.; Zhou, Q. A multi-fidelity surrogate modeling method based on variance-weighted sum for the
fusion of multiple non-hierarchical low-fidelity data. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 2021, 64, 3797-818. DOI
47. Palizhati, A.; Torrisi, S. B.; Aykol, M.; Suram, S. K.; Hummelshøj, J. S.; Montoya, J. H. Agents for sequential learning using
multiple-fidelity data. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4694. DOI PubMed PMC
48. Le Gratiet, L. Multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression for computer experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris-Diderot - Paris VII,
Paris, France, 2013. https://theses.hal.science/tel-00866770/file/manuscrit.pdf (accessed 2026-3-26).
49. Meng, X.; Karniadakis, G. E. A composite neural network that learns from multi-fidelity data: Application to function approximation
and inverse PDE problems. J. Comput. Phys. 2020, 401, 109020. DOI
50. Moss, H. B.; Leslie, D. S.; Rayson, P. MUMBO: MUlti-task max-value Bayesian optimization. In Machine Learning and Knowledge
Discovery in Databases; Hutter, F., Kersting, K., Lijffijt, J., Valera, I., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021; pp 447-62.
DOI
51. Xu, X.; Zhao, W.; Hu, Y.; et al. Discovery of thermosetting polymers with low hygroscopicity, low thermal expansivity, and high
modulus by machine learning. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023, 11, 12918-27. DOI
52. Patra, A.; Batra, R.; Chandrasekaran, A.; Kim, C.; Huan, T. D.; Ramprasad, R. A multi-fidelity information-fusion approach to machine
learn and predict polymer bandgap. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2020, 172, 109286. DOI
53. Molkeri, A.; Khatamsaz, D.; Couperthwaite, R.; et al. On the importance of microstructure information in materials design: PSP vs PP.
Acta. Mater. 2022, 223, 117471. DOI
54. Fare, C.; Fenner, P.; Benatan, M.; Varsi, A.; Pyzer-knapp, E. O. A multi-fidelity machine learning approach to high throughput materials
screening. npj. Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 257. DOI
55. He, Y.; Cubuk, E. D.; Allendorf, M. D.; Reed, E. J. Metallic metal-organic frameworks predicted by the combination of machine
learning methods and Ab initio calculations. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 4562-9. DOI PubMed
56. Yang, J.; Manganaris, P.; Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. Discovering novel halide perovskite alloys using multi-fidelity machine learning
and genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 160, 064114. DOI PubMed
57. Xu, B.; Hu, X.; Lan, H.; et al. Phthalonitrile melting point prediction enabled by multi-fidelity learning. J. Mater. Inf. 2024, 4, 21. DOI
