Page 73 - Read Online
P. 73

Page 10 of 15                        Wu et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 14  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2024.77

               RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
               Coverage-dependent adsorption energy on different indexed surfaces
               Leveraging our trained model for predicting adsorption energies, we calculated the steady-state CO
               adsorption energies for approximately 7 million configurations within the target configuration space,
               plotting CO adsorption energy versus coverage spectra for eight Cu crystallographic surfaces [Figure 5]. It
               was observed that each of the eight Cu surfaces corresponds to a unique CO coverage threshold, within
               which the adsorption energy of the most stable adsorption configurations changes minimally. Beyond this
               coverage threshold, the adsorption energy of the most stable configurations decreases significantly with
               increasing coverage. This trend aligns with physical intuition: at low coverages, the CO molecules in steady-
               state adsorption configurations are widely spaced, making non-bonding interactions between CO molecules
               negligible; however, at medium to high coverages, the surface arrangement of CO molecules in steady-state
               configurations becomes more compact, increasing molecular repulsion and thus increasing the system’s
               potential energy, leading to decreased adsorption energies for CO molecules. Furthermore, aside from the
               (100) and (111) surfaces (where all surface atoms have the same coordination number), CO molecules
               preferentially occupy lower-coordination Cu sites that are energetically less favorable, and, with increasing
               coverage, gradually cover higher-coordination Cu sites [Supplementary Figure 5]. At the same time, the
               average coordination number of Cu atoms occupied by CO at each coverage level remains lower than the
               average coordination number of surface Cu atoms, indicating a clear lowest-energy orientation for CO
               adsorption. These computational results are consistent with previous research findings [58-60] . Understanding
               the ease of C–C coupling on different Cu surfaces is crucial for developing Cu-based nanometal catalysts
               with high selectivity for C  products in CO RR reactions, as easier C–C coupling between CO molecules
                                                     2
                                      2+
               leads to higher selectivity for C  products [61-65] .
                                         2+
               Here, we employed two straightforward metrics to evaluate the ease of C–C coupling on Cu surfaces. The
               first metric is the mean minimum C–C distance (MMCD) within the set of most stable adsorption
               configurations at various coverages, which serves as an indicator of the probability of C–C coupling. A
               smaller MMCD suggests a higher likelihood of coupling. The second metric is the characteristic coverage of
               the surface: taking the densely packed (111) surface as a reference and using its maximum adsorption
               energy as a threshold, the maximum coverage achievable by other surfaces without falling below this
               adsorption energy threshold is deemed their characteristic coverage. To facilitate successful C–C coupling,
               CO must exhibit sufficient adsorption strength on Cu surfaces to prevent the reactants from desorbing,
               which would interrupt the coupling reaction. Moreover, compared to the MMCD, the surface’s
               characteristic coverage offers a more macroscopic dimension for representing the probability of C–C
               coupling, providing a holistic view. As illustrated in Figure 6, we analyzed these two metrics across eight Cu
               surfaces and found that the (310) surface exhibits the best C–C coupling performance, while the (111)
               surface performs the worst. The performance ranking of (310) > (210) > (311) > (100) > (111) is largely in
               agreement with experimental observations [40,60] . High-index surfaces tend to have smaller MMCDs and
               greater characteristic coverages, indicating a higher probability of C–C coupling and better selectivity for C
                                                                                                         2+
               products. This finding aligns with our current theoretical and experimental research, which shows that
               high-index surfaces offer a greater variety of surface sites and an abundance of low-coordination surface Cu
               atoms. These features provide more stable adsorption sites and a superior surface electronic environment
               conducive to C–C coupling [66,67] . Additionally, the (322) surface emerged as a potential candidate due to its
               MMCD and characteristic coverage closely approaching those of the (310) surface, which has been
               experimentally proven to exhibit excellent selectivity for C  products .
                                                                         [40]
                                                                2+
               CONCLUSIONS
               In this work, our investigation into the adsorption configurations of CO on Cu surfaces unveils critical
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78