Page 62 - Read Online

Zhu et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 8 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2024.76 Page 19 of 20

REFERENCES
1. Russell, A. Ductility in intermetallic compounds. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2003, 5, 629-39. DOI
2. Taub, A. I.; Fleischer, R. L. Intermetallic compounds for high-temperature structural use. Science 1989, 243, 616-21. DOI PubMed
3. Dshemuchadse, J.; Steurer, W. Some statistics on intermetallic compounds. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 1120-8. DOI PubMed
4. Yamaguchi, M.; Inui, H.; Ito, K. High-temperature structural intermetallics. Acta. Mater. 2000, 48, 307-22. DOI
5. Kimura, Y.; Pope, D. P. Ductility and toughness in intermetallics. Intermetallics 1998, 6, 567-71. DOI
6. Zhu, D.; Pan, K.; Wu, H.; et al. Identifying intrinsic factors for ductile-to-brittle transition temperatures in Fe–Al intermetallics via
machine learning. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 26, 8836-45. DOI
7. Ravindran, P.; Asokamani, R. Correlation between electronic structure, mechanical properties and phase stability in intermetallic
compounds. Bull. Mater. Sci. 1997, 20, 613-22. DOI
8. Kim, S. H.; Kim, H.; Kim, N. J. Brittle intermetallic compound makes ultrastrong low-density steel with large ductility. Nature 2015,
518, 77-9. DOI PubMed
9. Crawley, A. F. Densities of liquid metals and alloys. Int. Metall. Rev. 1974, 19, 32-48. DOI
10. Fleischer, R. L. High-strength, high-temperature intermetallic compounds. J. Mater. Sci. 1987, 22, 2281-8. DOI
11. Stoloff, N.; Liu, C.; Deevi, S. Emerging applications of intermetallics. Intermetallics 2000, 8, 1313-20. DOI
12. Uenishi, K.; Kobayashi, K. Processing of intermetallic compounds for structural applications at high temperature. Intermetallics 1996,
4, S95-101. DOI
13. Paul, A. R.; Mukherjee, M.; Singh, D. A critical review on the properties of intermetallic compounds and their application in the
modern manufacturing. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2022, 57, 2100159. DOI
14. Fatima, B.; Chouhan, S. S.; Acharya, N.; Sanyal, S. P. Density functional study of XRh (X=Sc, Y, Ti and Zr) intermetallic compounds.
Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 89, 205-15. DOI
15. Lu, Z. W.; Wei, S.; Zunger, A.; Frota-Pessoa, S.; Ferreira, L. G. First-principles statistical mechanics of structural stability of
intermetallic compounds. Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter. 1991, 44, 512-44. DOI PubMed
16. Zhu, D.; Pan, K.; Wu, Y.; et al. Improved material descriptors for bulk modulus in intermetallic compounds via machine learning.
Rare. Met. 2023, 42, 2396-405. DOI
17. Oliynyk, A. O.; Mar, A. Discovery of intermetallic compounds from traditional to machine-learning approaches. Acc. Chem. Res.
2018, 51, 59-68. DOI PubMed
18. Medasani, B.; Gamst, A.; Ding, H.; et al. Predicting defect behavior in B2 intermetallics by merging ab initio modeling and machine
learning. npj. Comput. Mater. 2016, 2, 1. DOI
19. Nie, M.; Chen, D.; Wang, D. Reinforcement learning on graphs: a survey. IEEE. Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 2023, 7, 1065-82.
DOI
20. Xie, T.; Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material
properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 145301. DOI PubMed
21. Park, C. W.; Wolverton, C. Developing an improved crystal graph convolutional neural network framework for accelerated materials
discovery. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2020, 4, 063801. DOI
22. Reiser, P.; Neubert, M.; Eberhard, A.; et al. Graph neural networks for materials science and chemistry. Commun. Mater. 2022, 3, 93.
DOI PubMed PMC
23. Dreger, M.; Eslamibidgoli, M. J.; Eikerling, M. H.; Malek, K. Synergizing ontologies and graph databases for highly flexible
materials-to-device workflow representations. J. Mater. Inf. 2023, 3, 2. DOI
24. Choudhary, K.; Decost, B. Atomistic line graph neural network for improved materials property predictions. npj. Comput. Mater.
2021, 7, 650. DOI
25. Wu, X.; Wang, H.; Gong, Y.; et al. Graph neural networks for molecular and materials representation. J. Mater. Inf. 2023, 3, 12. DOI
26. Fung, V.; Zhang, J.; Juarez, E.; Sumpter, B. G. Benchmarking graph neural networks for materials chemistry. npj. Comput. Mater.
2021, 7, 554. DOI
27. Dai, M.; Demirel, M. F.; Liang, Y.; Hu, J. Graph neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of the properties of
polycrystalline materials. npj. Comput. Mater. 2021, 7, 574. DOI
28. Jain, A.; Ong, S. P.; Hautier, G.; et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials
innovation. APL. Materials. 2013, 1, 011002. DOI
29. Chicco, D.; Warrens, M. J.; Jurman, G. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE,
MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ. Comput. Sci. 2021, 7, e623. DOI PubMed PMC
30. Chai, T.; Draxler, R. R. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? - Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the
literature. Geosci. Model. Dev. 2014, 7, 1247-50. DOI
31. Zhu, D.; Wu, H.; Hou, F.; et al. A transfer learning strategy for tensile strength prediction in austenitic stainless steel across
temperatures. Scr. Mater. 2024, 251, 116210. DOI
32. Bradley, A. P. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern. Recognit. 1997, 30,
1145-59. DOI
33. Yoshida Laboratory. XenonPy. 2020. https://github.com/yoshida-lab/XenonPy. (accessed 2025-02-05).
34. Fessler, J.; Sutton, B. Nonuniform fast fourier transforms using min-max interpolation. IEEE. Trans. Signal. Process. 2003, 51, 560-