Page 121 - Read Online

Page 14 of 15 Shang et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 52 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2025.36

10. Yan, J.; Cao, D.; Li, M.; et al. High-throughput computational screening of all-MXene metal-semiconductor junctions for Schottky-
Barrier-Free contacts with weak fermi-level pinning. Small 2023, 19, e2303675. DOI PubMed
11. Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Li, Z.; Cao, F.; Lu, X.; Fang, X. Work-function-tunable MXenes electrodes to optimize p-CsCu I /n-Ca Nb Ta O
2
2 3
3-x
10
x
junction photodetectors for image sensing and logic electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2201066. DOI
12. Ahn, S.; Han, T. H.; Maleski, K.; et al. A 2D titanium carbide MXene flexible electrode for high-efficiency light-emitting diodes. Adv.
Mater. 2020, 32, e2000919. DOI PubMed
13. Gregoire, J. M.; Zhou, L.; Haber, J. A. Combinatorial synthesis for AI-driven materials discovery. Nat. Synth. 2023, 2, 493-504. DOI
14. Ghalati, M. K.; Zhang, J.; El-Fallah, G. M. A. M.; Nenchev, B.; Dong, H. Toward learning steelmaking - a review on machine learning
for basic oxygen furnace process. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2023, 1, e6. DOI
15. Lombardo, T.; Duquesnoy, M.; El-Bouysidy, H.; et al. Artificial intelligence applied to battery research: hype or reality? Chem. Rev.
2022, 122, 10899-969. DOI PubMed PMC
16. Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, J.; et al. Interpretable machine learning for stability and electronic structure prediction of Janus III-VI van der
Waals heterostructures. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2024, 2, e76. DOI
17. Schleder, G. R.; Acosta, C. M.; Fazzio, A. Exploring two-dimensional materials thermodynamic stability via machine learning. ACS.
Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020, 12, 20149-57. DOI PubMed
18. Huang, M.; Wang, S.; Zhu, H. A comprehensive machine learning strategy for designing high-performance photoanode catalysts. J.
Mater. Chem. A. 2023, 11, 21619-27. DOI
19. Bai, X.; Lu, S.; Song, P.; et al. Heterojunction of MXenes and MN -graphene: machine learning to accelerate the design of bifunctional
4
oxygen electrocatalysts. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2024, 664, 716-25. DOI PubMed
20. Tao, Q.; Xu, P.; Li, M.; Lu, W. Machine learning for perovskite materials design and discovery. npj. Comput. Mater. 2021, 7, 23. DOI
21. Siriwardane, E. M. D.; Zhao, Y.; Perera, I.; Hu, J. Generative design of stable semiconductor materials using deep learning and density
functional theory. npj. Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 164. DOI
22. Roy, P.; Rekhi, L.; Koh, S. W.; Li, H.; Choksi, T. S. Predicting the work function of 2D MXenes using machine-learning methods. J.
Phys. Energy. 2023, 5, 034005. DOI
23. Prasad Raju, N. V. D. S. S. V.; Devi, P. N. A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for big data applications in
predictive analytics. Int. J. Sci. Res. Manag. 2024, 12, 1608-30. DOI
24. Zhong, X.; Gallagher, B.; Liu, S.; Kailkhura, B.; Hiszpanski, A.; Han, T. Y. Explainable machine learning in materials science. npj.
Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 204. DOI
25. Gjerding, M. N.; Taghizadeh, A.; Rasmussen, A.; et al. Recent progress of the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB). 2D.
Mater. 2021, 8, 044002. DOI
26. Haastrup, S.; Strange, M.; Pandey, M.; et al. The Computational 2D Materials Database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of
atomically thin crystals. 2D. Mater. 2018, 5, 042002. DOI
27. Li, H.; Deng, C.; Li, F.; Ma, M.; Tang, Q. Investigation of dual atom doped single-layer MoS for electrochemical reduction of carbon
2
dioxide by first-principle calculations and machine-learning. J. Mater. Inf. 2023, 3, 25. DOI
28. Abdullah, G. M. S.; Ahmad, M.; Babur, M.; et al. Boosting-based ensemble machine learning models for predicting unconfined
compressive strength of geopolymer stabilized clayey soil. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 2323. DOI PubMed PMC
29. Alzamzami, F.; Hoda, M.; El Saddik, A. Light gradient boosting machine for general sentiment classification on short texts: a
comparative evaluation. IEEE. Access. 2020, 8, 101840-58. DOI
30. Ouyang, R.; Curtarolo, S.; Ahmetcik, E.; Scheffler, M.; Ghiringhelli, L. M. SISSO: a compressed-sensing method for identifying the
best low-dimensional descriptor in an immensity of offered candidates. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2018, 2, 083802. DOI
31. Lundberg, S.; Lee, S. I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1705.07874. https://doi.org/10.48550/
arXiv.1705.07874. (accessed 1 Aug 2025)
32. Sun, T.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, L.; Feng, G. Identifying MOFs for electrochemical energy storage via density functional theory and machine
learning. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 90. DOI
33. Li, S. Density functional theory for catalyst development and mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Clean. Technol. 2025, 1, 602. DOI
34. Chen, L.; Chen, Z.; Yao, X.; et al. High-entropy alloy catalysts: high-throughput and machine learning-driven design. J. Mater. Inf.
2022, 2, 19. DOI
35. Xu, M.; Xu, M.; Miao, X. Deep machine learning unravels the structural origin of mid-gap states in chalcogenide glass for high-
density memory integration. InfoMat 2022, 4, e12315. DOI
36. Pearson, K. VII. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. - III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philos. Trans. R. Soc.
Lond. A. 1896, 187, 253-318. DOI
37. Ma, B.; Wu, X.; Zhao, C.; et al. An interpretable machine learning strategy for pursuing high piezoelectric coefficients in (K Na )
0.5 0.5
NbO -based ceramics. npj. Comput. Mater. 2023, 9, 229. DOI
3
38. Wang, T.; Hu, J.; Ouyang, R.; et al. Nature of metal-support interaction for metal catalysts on oxide supports. Science 2024, 386, 915-
20. DOI PubMed
39. Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Statist. 2001, 29, 1189-232. https://www.jstor.org/
stable/2699986. (accessed 1 Aug 2025)
40. Roy, A.; Chakraborty, S. Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: a review. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2023, 233, 109126.
DOI