Page 25 - Read Online
P. 25

Wang et al. J Mater Inf 2023;3:3  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2022.45        Page 3 of 15

               P(O ), and Sr content. The primary poisoning mechanism proposed was the formation of SrSO from the
                   2
                                                                                                  4
               reaction of SO  with SrO and O  to form SrSO . Subsequent reactions would start to form other sulfur-
                                           2
                                                        4
                            2
               containing phases like La O SO  and La (SO ) through a reaction with the La components. However, much
                                       2
                                                    4 3
                                          4
                                    2
                                                 2
               remains unknown as to how these poisoning reactions are affected by the structure and composition of the
               cathode material, which limits our ability to design cathodes with improved long-term stability in the
               presence of natural SO  impurities. Moreover, a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between
                                   2
               the long-term degradation and single or eventually multiple gas impurities poisoning effects is still needed.
               In this work, we have utilized a combined computational and experimental approach to understand the
               sulfur poisoning mechanism(s) and improve the long-term durability of LSCF cathodes in order to develop
               better-performing sulfur-tolerant cathode materials in the future. We first examined the agreement between
               the simulation approach and the experimental observations at various conditions, confirming the reliability
               of CALPHAD for poisoning simulations in these cathode systems. Using this approach, we then
               investigated the accelerated testing protocol, which has become the standard method for conducting sulfur
               poisoning experiments involving LSCF cathode materials. We found that our simulation approach is able to
               predict in which systems (cathode material and treatment environment) the accelerated testing protocols
               reflect actual operating conditions. Finally, in-depth simulations were done for LSCF and compared with
               those for LSM to help understand the LSCF cell system and suggest directions toward alternative cathode
               materials that have superior sulfur tolerance.

               EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
               The as-received (La Sr ) Co Fe O  (denoted as LSCF-6428) powders (FuelCellMaterials) were shaped
                                                3
                                             0.8
                                   0.4 0.95
                                          0.2
                                0.6
               into several pellets with thickness and diameter of around 1 and 13 mm, respectively. Afterward, the pellets
               were pre-sintered in the ambient air at 1,200 °C for 2h to facilitate handling and remove the binders. Later,
               the pre-sintered pellets were heat-treated at 800 °C, 900 °C, and 1,000 °C under SO -containing dry air
                                                                                         2
               (10ppm SO  balanced with dry air, Airgas) or dry Argon (10ppm SO  balanced with Argon, Airgas) in the
                         2
                                                                          2
               tube furnace (OTF-1500X-III, MTI Corporation) for 2 days. The furnace was equipped with 3 independent
               temperature zones, which allowed the above experiments with the same atmospheric but different
               temperature conditions to be run in the same batch. Finally, the samples were collected after furnace
               cooling for further characterization.
               The crystal structures of all the samples, including the commercial powder, pre-sintered and heat-treated
               pellets, were examined by X-ray Diffraction with a Cu tube (PANalytical EMPYREAN) in the range of 20-
               60°. Later, the microstructure and elemental distributions of the heat-treated pellets were investigated by
               Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (JEOL JSM-7000F) coupled with Energy-dispersive X-ray
                                                          N
               Spectroscopy (EDS) (Oxford Instrument X-MAX ) to characterize the secondary phases. Transmission
               electron microscope (TEM) samples, ca. 100 nm thick cross-sections mounted on Cu support grids, were
               prepared using a Thermo Fisher Helios 460F1 dual-beam focused ion beam (FIB-SEM) using a Ga ion beam
               and standard FIB lift-out procedures to minimize ion damage/implantation. The electron beam was used to
               deposit a carbon protective layer on the top surface of each lift-out lamella, and the voltage of the cutting
               ion beam was progressively lowered as each lift-out lamella was thinned down to ca. 100 nm and cleaned.
               Each FIB-prepared TEM sample was characterized by TEM imaging, diffraction, and spectroscopy
               (elemental mapping).


               Bright Field TEM images and diffraction patterns were obtained for each FIB-prepared TEM sample using a
               Thermo Fisher Talos TEM equipped with a CETA-M camera, operating at 200 keV, gun lens = 4,
               spot size = 8, CLA(2) = 70 µm, and beam current: ca. 0.3 nA. An objective lens aperture (OLA) of 70 µm was
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30