Page 36 - Read Online
P. 36

Greene et al. J Environ Expo Assess 2024;3:12  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jeea.2024.09  Page 13 of 15

               The general trend of HBGVs for PFOA, PFOS, and other PFAS also raises the question of the relative
               importance of exposures derived from water and those derived from other sources (e.g., consumer products,
               diet, etc.) A recent analysis considered this question using NHANES serum concentrations as an indicator
                                          [44]
               of non-water PFOA exposure . The analysis found that at a water concentration of 1 ng/L, water
               contributed 4% and 9.7% of total PFOA exposure for mean and 95th percentile water intake rates,
               respectively. Drinking water concentrations of PFOA below 0.1 ng/L showed negligible contribution to total
               PFOA exposure. This suggests that reductions in PFOA below 1 ng/L will have limited impact on serum
               levels in the general population in the absence of a coordinated effort to reduce non-water exposures to
               PFOA (and by extension, other bioaccumulative PFAS and their precursors) from food, consumer products,
               and other sources.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               The authors thank Sarah Fossen Johnson and Kristine Klos for their review and comments during the
               development of the manuscript.

               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the revised model and model parameters:
               Greene CW, Bogdan AR, Goeden HM


               Availability of data and materials
               The revised toxicokinetic model is available as an Excel file; to obtain a copy, contact the authors.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               This work was supported in part by the Clean Water Fund under the Minnesota Clean Water, Land, and
               Legacy Amendment.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Authors 2024.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Lifetime health advisories and health effects support documents for perfluorooctanoic acid
                   and perfluorooctane sulfonate. 2016. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2016-05-25/pdf/2016-12361.pdf. [Last
                   accessed on 19 Apr 2024].
               2.       Midasch O, Drexler H, Hart N, Beckmann MW, J Angerer. Transplacental exposure of neonates to perfluorooctanesulfonate and
                   perfluorooctanoate: a pilot study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2007;80:643-8.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Beesoon S, Webster GM, Shoeib M, Harner T, Benskin JP, Martin JW. Isomer profiles of perfluorochemicals in matched maternal,
                   cord, and house dust samples: manufacturing sources and transplacental transfer. Environ Health Perspect 2011;119:1659-64.  DOI
                   PubMed  PMC
               4.  Lee YJ, Kim MK, Bae J, Yang JH. Concentrations of perfluoroalkyl compounds in maternal and umbilical cord sera and birth
                   outcomes in Korea. Chemosphere 2013;90:1603-9.  DOI  PubMed
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41