Page 507 - Read Online
P. 507

Wu et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2020;6:40  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.77                              Page 7 of 9

               extra use of steroids and cessation of nivolumab certainly further contributed to his disease progression.
               Consequently, understanding the correlation between skin irAEs and clinical outcome could provide
               valuable information in distinguishing between pseudo-progression and immunotherapy resistance, which
               will assist oncologists in the decision of resuming immunotherapy after the recovery from manageable skin
               irAEs.


               The mechanism of immunotherapy induced BP is currently unclear. While BP is associated with both a
               humoral and a cellular response, it is widely believed that immunotherapy induced BP could be provoked
               by an autoantibody targeted to a sharedantigen and the dysfunction in T-regulatory cells, which is inhibited
                                [23]
               by immunotherapy . The shared target antigen is located both at the dermoepidermal junction and on
               the surface of tumour cells, such as BP 180, whichcan be expressed on the surface of melanoma cells, non-
               small cell lung cancer cells and basement membrane skin cancer [24,25] . Meanwhile, dysregulation of PD-1/
               PD-L1 and CTLA-4 signal pathway induced by immunotherapy can impair the balance within the immune
                                                                               [26]
               system, resulting in the development of off-target effects and autoimmunity . Further studies are required
               to determine the underlying mechanisms of immunotherapy induced BP.


               Conclusion
               Here, we report a rare case of severe, extensive and refractory nivolumab-induced BP in a patient with
               advanced renal cancer. With the widespread use of immunotherapy, it has become increasingly important
               to document cases of immunotherapy-induced BP to provide more information in diagnosing and treating
               these cutaneous adverse events. Moreover, the close collaboration between dermatologists and oncologists
               is essential to allow the patients with cutaneous irAEs to continue antitumor therapy, avoiding unnecessary
               discontinuation of immunotherapy.

               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               All authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Dalila Malek, Dr. Paul Gatt, Dr. Ravi Suchak and Dr. Marice
               Sudaerson (Southend Hospital) for support and advice.

               Authors’ contributions
               Designed the study and wrote the manuscript: Wu X, Palvai S
               Reviewed and approved the manuscript: Jalil A

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               This study support by National Health Service Funding.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

               Consent for publication
               Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any
               companying images.
   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512