Page 506 - Read Online
P. 506

Page 6 of 9                               Wu et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2020;6:40  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.77

                44    Nivolumab         Melanoma  Cutaneous BP            Topical/oral steroids and dapsone  [13]
                45    Nivolumab         Melanoma  MMP                     Topical steroids           [45]
                46    Pembrolizumab     Ovarian Ca.  Severe MMP     3     Topical and oral steroids     [46]
                47    Nivolumab         Lung      Oral and cutaneous BP   Oral steroid               [8]
                48    Atezolizumab      Penile SCC   Photodistributed BP  Oral steroids              [47]
                49    Atezolizumab      Urothelial cell  Cutaneous BP  77   Topical steroids, doxycycline and   [15]
                                        Ca.                               niacinamide
                50    Nivolumab         Renal cell Ca.  Cutaneous BP  52   IV and oral steroids      [48]
                51    Durvalumab and    NSCLC     BP                42    Oral steroids              [49]
                      tremelimumab
                52    Cemiplimab        Cutaneous   BP                    Oral steroids and rituximab  [50]
                                        SCC

               SCC: squamous cell cancer; Ca.: carcinoma; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; MMP: mucous membrane pemphigoid; BP: bullous
               pemphigoid

               may develop in the presence of anti-LAD-1 IgG antibodies alone but absence of anti-BP180 or anti-BP230
                            [13]
               autoantibodies .
               Treatment regimens generally include steroids (oral or topical or combination), often in conjunction with
               discontinuation of immunotherapy. As steroids can potentially diminish immunomodulatory actions,
               topical steroids are first-line treatment for BP and are largely safe due to their limited systemic absorption.
               Meanwhile, oral nicotinamide and tetracycline (doxycycline or minocycline) have demonstrated a good
               effect in mild or moderate cases whilst completely avoiding systemic steroids [14,15] . The role of nicotinamide
               in treating BP is modulating inflammatory cytokines and acting as poly adenosine diphosphate ribose
                                 [16]
               polymerase inhibitor . However, severe cases have frequently required intravenous methylprednisolone
               (1-2 mg/kg). Refractory immunotherapy-induced BP shows response to rituximab or omalizumab [12,17] ,
               which are started after immunotherapy discontinuation and lead to resolution of BP. Future studies are
               warranted to explore targeted immunosuppressant agents for severe steroid-refractory BP.


               The question of resuming immunotherapy after resolution of BP remains under discussion. In the
               situations where immunotherapy is ineffective, discontinuation is clearly warranted. While in the context of
               a clinical response to immunotherapy, the discontinuation of immunotherapy is challenging, and the risks
               of continued treatment must be carefully weighed against its benefits. As such, the decision of resuming
               immunotherapy should be made as a part of multidisciplinary team and on an individual basis. In one
               case report BP developed after the patient was transitioned to a higher dose of nivolumab. Another case
                                                                                          [18]
               report showed improvement in BP after switching from nivolumab to pembrolizumab . Consequently,
               immunotherapy should not be permanently discontinued without the trial of the previously tolerated dose
               or frequency or different immunotherapy.


               Understanding the correlation between the incidence rate of skin irAEs and oncology benefit or
               immunotherapy resistance is critical for clinical practice. There is some evidence showing potential
               positive association between development of cutaneous irAEs and improved survival in patients on
               immunotherapy, particularly vitiligo [19,20] . In addition, a systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that
               the skin, gastrointestinal and endocrine irAEs might be positively associated with clinical benefit, while
               the pulmonary irAEs might be associated with immunotherapy resistance . However, the development of
                                                                              [21]
               severe BP in our case is not a marker of good response to immunotherapy, as the patient failed to respond
               to nivolumab despite the extensive, refractory, severe BP. Immunotherapy resistance can be classified
                                                                                                   [22]
               as primary, such as in never-responders, or acquired, which emerges after a period of response . Our
               patient had continuously slow disease progression in his metastatic left adrenal and left kidney mass since
               nivolumab, which could be primary immunotherapy resistance. However, we could not totally exclude the
               possibility of pseudo-progression, as his other metastatic diseases were largely stable. In a later phase, the
   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511