Page 50 - Read Online
P. 50

Paridar et al.                                                                                                                                                                 BCR-ABL and myelodysplastic syndrome

                                                                              Hematological
            No.  Age/gender  MDS subtype  Ph+ phase/type  Cytogenetic findings              Outcome       Ref.
                                                                              findings
            17   78/F       RCMD         At CML          46, XX, t(9;22) (q34;q11)  Hb = 10.2  Progressed to   [45]
                                         transformation/-                     WBC = 2.6     CML accelerated
                                                                              Plt = 152     phase/response
                                                                                            to imatinib
                                                                                            with significant
                                                                                            cytopenia
            18   56/M       RA           At diagnosis/-  Complex karyotype with   Hb = 4.8  Progressed to   [46]
                                                         PH1 chromosome       WBC = 2.4     AML/died
                                                                              Plt = 350
            19   49/F       -            At diagnosis/-  t(9;22) (q34;q11) [38%]  Hb = 8.2  Progressed to   [47]
                                                                              WBC = 6.5     AML/died
                                                                              Plt = 425
            20   62/M       RAEB         AML transformation  t(9;22) (q34:q11) [100%]  Hb = 9.8  Progressed to   [48]
                                                                              WBC = 3.2     AML/died
                                                                              Plt =120
            21   70/F       RARS         At diagnosis/-  46, XX[3]/46, XX, t(9q;22q)   Hb = 9.5  Stable/alive  [49]
                                                         [12]                 WBC = 6.4
                                                                              Plt = 316
            22   69/M       t-MDS        AML transfomation  46, XY, t(9;22)(q34;q11) [35]  Hb (no data)  Progressed to   [50]
                                                                              WBC = 1.3     AML
                                                                              Plt = 129
           MDS: myelodysplastic syndromes; AML: acute myeloblastic leukemia; CML: chronic myeloid leukemia; ALL: acute lymphoblastic leukemia
           only  FISH  analysis  has  managed  to  detect  BCR-  Conflicts of interest
           ABL fusion in MDS patients, lack of detection in   There are no conflicts of interest.
           normal karyotype analysis does not indicate definitive
           absence of this fusion. [5,11]   Assessment of reported   Patient consent
           cases shows that MDS  patients  harboring this     Patient consent was obtained.
           chromosomal abnormality typically do not respond
           well to conventional treatments but do show a good   Ethical approval
           response to imatinib therapy. [11,13]  Since imatinib is not   This article does not contain  any studies involving
           routinely used in treatment of MDS patients, lack of   human or animal subjects.
           Ph detection in these patients may lead to incorrect
           treatment and thus put the patient’s life at risk.  REFERENCES

           In general, although the findings of this study indicate   1.   Cogle  CR, Saki  N, Khodadi  E,  Li  J, Shahjahani  M, Azizidoost  S.
                                                                 Bone marrow niche  in the myelodysplastic  syndromes.  Leuk Res
           the importance of Ph detection in MDS patients, they   2015;39:1020-7.
           are  not  sufficient  to  clarify  the  precise  role  of  Ph in   2.   Visconte V, Selleri C, Maciejewski JP, Tiu RV. Molecular pathogenesis
           MDS  patients.  Therefore,  specific  assessment  of   of myelodysplastic syndromes. Transl Med Uni Sa 2014;8:19-30.
           this chromosomal abnormality in MDS  patients  is   3.   Shukron O, Vainstein V, Kündgen A, Germing U, Agur Z. Analyzing
           recommended in future studies.                        transformation  of  myelodysplastic  syndrome  to  secondary  acute
                                                                 myeloid leukemia  using a large patient  database.  Am J Hematol
           Authors’ contributions                             4.   2012;87:853-60.
                                                                 Greenberg PL, Attar E, Bennett JM, Bloomfield CD, Borate U, De
           Manuscript’s  conception and revision: N.  Saki, M.   Castro CM, Deeg HJ, Frankfurt O, Gaensler K, Garcia-Manero G,
           Paridar                                               Gore SD, Head D, Komrokji R, Maness LJ, Millenson M, O’Donnell
           Writing  the manuscript:  O.K.  Ghalesardi,  M.       MR, Shami PJ,  Stein BL, Stone RM, Thompson JE, Westervelt  P,
           Seghatoleslami, A. Ahmadzadeh                         Wheeler B, Shead DA, Naganuma M. Myelodysplastic syndromes:
           Tables’ preparation: A. Khosravi                      clinical  practice  guidelines in oncology.  J Natl Compr  Canc Netw
                                                                 2013;11:838-74.
                                                              5.   Vardiman  JW,  Thiele  J,  Arber DA, Brunning  RD, Borowitz  MJ,
           Acknowledgments                                       Porwit A, Harris NL, Le Beau MM, Hellström-Lindberg E, Tefferi A,
           This paper forms part of M.Sc.  thesis belonging  to   Bloomfield CD. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization
           Omid Kiani Ghalesardi.                                (WHO)  classification  of  myeloid  neoplasms  and  acute  leukemia:
                                                                 rationale and important changes. Blood 2009;114:937-51.
           Financial support and sponsorship                  6.   Rana A, Ali GM, Ali S, Khan A, Mansoor S, Malik S, Farooqi AA.
           This work was financially supported by grant TH94/11   BCR-ABL1 in leukemia: disguise master outplays riding shotgun.
                                                                 J Cancer Res Ther 2013;9:6-10.
           from  Vice-chancellor  for  Research  Affairs of  Ahvaz   7.   Tala I, Chen R, Hu T, Fitzpatrick ER, Williams DA, Whitehead IP.
           Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.           Contributions of the RhoGEF activity of p210 BCR/ABL to disease
             42                                                                Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ¦ Volume 3 ¦ February 28, 2017
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55