Page 24 - Read Online
P. 24

CTLA-4 on  T-cell responses, [15-18]  although there are   Table 1: Relation between CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms
            contradictory reports on the relationship between +49 A   and tumor grade, stage, size, metastasis, estrogen receptor,
            to G polymorphisms and cancer development.        progesterone receptor and age
            Higher expression of CTLA-4 is seen in persons with                    AA (%)  AG (%) GG (%)   P
            thiamine on zone -318 of  CTLA-4 gene promoter or   Tumor grade
            homogenous adenine on exon 1 of codon +49. [14]  There   1             20 (80)  23 (71.9) 1 (33.3) 0.21
            have been several studies on the relationship between   2              3 (12)  5 (15.6)  1 (33.3)
            polymorphisms on  CTLA-4 gene and autoimmune        3                   2 (8)  4 (12.5)  1 (33.3)
            diseases such as graves, diabetes mellitus type one,   Tumor stage
            lupus and Hashimoto thyroiditis [19-22]  and the tendency   ≤ 2        15 (75)  18 (72)  3 (100)  0.50
            to develop cancer. [23-27]  Results of some studies   > 2              5 (25)   7 (28)  0 (0)
            show an inverse relation between polymorphisms of   Tumor size
            autoimmune diseases and malignancies on  CTLA-4     ≤ 2 cm            11 (68.8) 14 (58.3)  0 (0)  0.50
            gene.  Alleles discovered in autoimmune diseases are   2-5 cm          3 (18.8)  8 (33.3)  1 (100)
            not seen in malignancies or are related to a good   > 5 cm             2 (12.5)  2 (8.3)  0 (0)
            prognosis of cancers. In a study in Iran, results   Metastasis        27 (64.3) 43 (87.7) 5 (83.3) 0.02
                                                                No
            suggested higher risk of breast cancer among  AA    Yes               15 (35.7)  6 (12.2)  1 (16.7)
            and  AG genotypes on +49 zone, but there was no   Estrogen receptor
            difference between -318 CT and -1666 AG among case   Negative          10 (37)  9 (23.7)  2 (33.3) 0.49
            and control groups. [23,24]
                                                                Positive           17 (63)  29 (76.3) 4 (66.7)
            Considering the high prevalence of breast cancer and   Progesterone receptor
            also some confi rmed evidence of a relationship between   Negative     12 (44.4)  8 (21.6)  2 (33.3) 0.15
            CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer, we     Positive          15 (55.6) 29 (78.4) 4 (66.7)
            conducted this study to assess the relationship between   Lymph node involvement
            CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms and both incidence and    No                36 (83.7) 38 (74.5) 5 (83.3) 0.53
            clinic pathologic features of breast cancer.  The results   Yes        7 (16.3)  13 (25.5) 1 (16.7)
            of this study would help physicians to recognize the   Age
            prognosis and risk ratio of patients with a high risk of   Under 40 years  24 (29.3) 54 (65.9)  4 (4.9)  0.30
            breast cancer.                                      Over 40 years     47 (29.8) 66 (55.9)  5 (4.2)
                                                               Data are presented as n (%). CTLA-4: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte
            Methods                                            antigen-4
            Study subjects
                                                              Polymorphism genotyping
            The study group consisted of a total of 100 Iranian
            women with breast cancer and 100 healthy cancer-free   Peripheral blood (5 mL) was collected from subjects
            control individuals. Informed consent was obtained from   after informed consent was obtained. Genomic DNA
            each subject, and each participant was then interviewed   was extracted from peripheral blood using the DNA
            to collect detailed information on demographic    extraction kit (BioFlux, cat: BSC 06M1, Hangzhou,
            characteristics such as sex and age. Some clinic   Bioer Technology Co., Ltd, China).
            pathologic features of breast cancer patients, such as   Genotyping was performed by polymerase chain
            tumor size, lymph node involvement, tumor type, and   reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism
            estrogen receptor (ER), were also obtained from their   method.  The polymorphic region was amplifi ed
            medical fi les [Table 1].                          by PCR using the following primers: (forward)
                                                              5’-CTAAGAGCATCCGCTTGCACCT-3’ and (reverse)
            Patients were recruited between February 2013 and
            October 2014 at the Shahid Sadughi Hospital and   5’-TTGGTGTGATGCACAGAAGCCTTT-3’ in a 25  L
            Cancer Hospital,  Yazd, Iran. Control subjects were   reaction solution containing 0.3 g of genomic DNA, ×1
            cancer-free individuals, and they were randomly   PCR buffer, 0.3 mmol/L MgCl , 0.2 mmol/L dNTPs, 2 U
                                                                                        2
            selected from the same regions and the same time   tag DNA polymerase and 0.1 mol/L of each primer.
            period as the patients were collected.  The selection   The following PCR program was run: 94 °C for 4 min,
            criteria included no individual history of breast or other   30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s and 7 °C for
            cancers.                                          45 s. Final extension was carried out at 72 °C for 5 min.
                                                              The lengths of the PCR products were 486 bp (1661AG).
            This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of
            Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd,   The PCR products were digested with restriction
            Iran.  A written informed consent was taken from all   enzymes  Tru1I (MseI) according to the manufacturer’s
            patients.                                         instructions (Thermo Scientifi c Fermentas, USA) and

                Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment  ¦  Volume 1 ¦ Issue 1 ¦ April 15, 2015 ¦       17
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29