Page 56 - Read Online
P. 56

Page 14 of 14              Pinnamaneni et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:7  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.94

               Copyright
               ©The Author(s) 2021.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Hennessy DW, Raskin KA, Schwab JH, Lozano-Calderón SA. Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the upper extremity in oncologic surgery.
                   J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;28:e319-27.
               2.   Pisters PW, Leung DH, Woodruff J, Shi W, Brennan MF. Analysis of prognostic factors in 1,041 patients with localized soft tissue
                   sarcomas of the extremities. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:1679-89.
               3.   Malawer MM, Meller I, Dunham WK. A new surgical classification system for shoulder-girdle resections. Analysis of 38 patients. Clin
                   Orthop Relat Res 1991;267:33-44.
               4.   Janssen SJ, van Rein EA, Paulino Pereira NR, et al. The discrepancy between patient and clinician reported function in extremity bone
                   metastases. Sarcoma 2016;2016:1014248.
               5.   Henderson ER, Groundland JS, Pala E, et al. Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five
                   institutions and a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:418-29.
               6.   Clark JM, Harryman DT. Tendons, ligaments, and capsule of the rotator cuff. Gross and microscopic anatomy. The Journal of Bone &
                   Joint Surgery 1992;74:713-25.
               7.   Malawer M, Wittig J. Overview of resections around the shoulder girdle: anatomy, surgical considerations and classification.
                   Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery 2006:179-202
               8.   Lee DH, Hills JM, Jordanov MI, Jaffe KA. Common tumors and tumor-like lesions of the shoulder. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27:236-45.
               9.   Farfalli GL, Ayerza MA, Muscolo DL, Aponte-Tinao LA. Proximal humeral osteoarticular allografts: technique, pearls and pitfalls,
                   outcomes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2015;8:334-8.
               10.  Gebhardt MC, Roth YF, Mankin HJ. Osteoarticular allografts for reconstruction in the proximal part of the humerus after excision of a
                   musculoskeletal tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:334-45.
               11.  Wang Z, Guo Z, Li J, Li XD, Sang HX. Functional outcomes and complications of reconstruction of the proximal humerus after intra-
                   articular tumor resection. Orthop Surg 2010;2:19-26.
               12.  Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, Springfield DS, Tomford WW. Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of
                   bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;324:86-97.
               13.  Getty PJ, Peabody TD. Complications and functional outcomes of reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft after intra-articular
                   resection of the proximal aspect of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:1138-46.
               14.  Marulanda GA, Henderson E, Cheong D, Letson GD. Proximal and total humerus reconstruction with the use of an aortograft mesh. Clin
                   Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:2896-903.
               15.  van de Sande MA, Dijkstra PD, Taminiau AH. Proximal humerus reconstruction after tumour resection: biological versus endoprosthetic
                   reconstruction. Int Orthop 2011;35:1375-80.
               16.  Kumar D, Grimer RJ, Abudu A, Carter SR, Tillman RM. Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. Long-term results. J Bone
                   Joint Surg Br 2003;85:717-22.
               17.  Teunis T, Nota SP, Hornicek FJ, Schwab JH, Lozano-Calderón SA. Outcome after reconstruction of the proximal humerus for tumor
                   resection: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:2245-53.
               18.  Ross AC, Sneath RS, Scales JT. Endoprosthetic replacement of the humerus and elbow joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69:652-5.
               19.  Cannon CP, Paraliticci GU, Lin PP, Lewis VO, Yasko AW. Functional outcome following endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal
                   humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:705-10.
               20.  Scotti C, Camnasio F, Peretti GM, Fontana F, Fraschini G. Modular prostheses in the treatment of proximal humerus metastases: review
                   of 40 cases. J Orthop Traumatol 2008;9:5-10.
               21.  Mayilvahanan N, Paraskumar M, Sivaseelam A, Natarajan S. Custom mega-prosthetic replacement for proximal humeral tumours. Int
                   Orthop 2006;30:158-62.
               22.  Raiss P, Kinkel S, Sauter U, Bruckner T, Lehner B. Replacement of the proximal humerus with MUTARS tumor endoprostheses. Eur J
                   Surg Oncol 2010;36:371-7.
               23.  Lozano-Calderón SA, Chen N. Proximal humerus allograft prosthetic composites: technique, outcomes, and pearls and pitfalls. Curr Rev
                   Musculoskelet Med 2015;8:324-33.
               24.  Ruggieri P, Mavrogenis AF, Guerra G, Mercuri M. Preliminary results after reconstruction of bony defects of the proximal humerus with
                   an allograft-resurfacing composite. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:1098-103.
               25.  Abdeen A, Hoang BH, Athanasian EA, Morris CD, Boland PJ, Healey JH. Allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction of the proximal
                   part of the humerus: functional outcome and survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:2406-15.
               26.  Maclean S, Malik SS, Evans S, Gregory J, Jeys L. Reverse shoulder endoprosthesis for pathologic lesions of the proximal humerus: a
                   minimum 3-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017;26:1990-4.
               27.  Griffiths D, Gikas PD, Jowett C, et al. Proximal humeral replacement using a fixed-fulcrum endoprosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br
                   2011;93:399-403.
               28.  Potter BK, Adams SC, Pitcher JD Jr, Malinin TI, Temple HT. Proximal humerus reconstructions for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res
                   2009;467:1035-41.
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61