Page 58 - Read Online
P. 58

Page 2 of 16       Karolak et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:15  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.05

               INTRODUCTION
               Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) constitute a highly heterogenous group of rare malignancies believed to be of
               mesenchymal origin. Mesenchymal stem cells harbour powerful self-renewal capacity and multi-lineage
               differentiation potential into various tissues, such as adipose, muscle, bone and cartilage. Over 60 distinct
               STS subtypes have been identified with regard to their biological features and clinical manifestation, making
               the classification of these tumours often problematic and challenging. STS can occur in any part of the body,
               but the most frequent sites include the extremities, head and neck areas as well as trunk. STS comprise
               around 1% of all adult cancers and around 8% of all paediatric and adolescent tumours. However, the
               spectrum of STS subtypes differs in these different age ranges. Despite being relatively rare cancers, the vast
               majority of diagnosed cases of STS present with highly aggressive behaviour, poor prognosis and advanced
               stage of the disease at point of detection. Many STS can be thought of as undifferentiated tumours, where
               STS cells express early markers of lineage-specific differentiation but do not differentiate into the mature,
               benign tissue type. For example, rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) resemble immature skeletal muscle cells that
               have failed to complete differentiation and cell cycle arrest, and the restoration of this process is considered
                                    [1,2]
               to be of therapeutic value .
               A number of STS discussed in this review, harbour specific genetic hallmarks, such as chromosome
               translocations and specific gene mutations or amplification events. These contribute to the process of
               oncogenesis and may be useful diagnostic features. An example is the recurrent chromosomal translocation
               t (X;18) (p11.2;q11.12) found in synovial sarcomas (SS), leading to gene fusions between SS18 on
               chromosome 18 and either SSX1, SSX2 or in rare cases SSX4 on chromosome X. The abnormal fusion
               protein SS18-SSX disrupts the epigenetic regulation of gene expression and is believed to drive sarcoma
                             [3,4]
               formation in SS . Another example is malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs), in which
               Neurofibromin (NF1) tumour suppressor gene mutations are thought to drive malignancy in some patients.
               Such mutations lead to inactivation of NF1 protein and therefore to development and pathogenesis of
               MPNSTs . The same holds true for extremely rare and aggressive atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours
                       [5]
               (ATRTs, brain) or malignant rhabdoid tumours (MRTs, kidneys and soft tissues) where homozygous
               inactivation of SMARCB1, and resultant deficiency of SMARCB1 protein, a member of the SWI/SNF
               complex,  occur  in  the  majority  of  these  malignancies . RMS,  ATRT  and  MRT  tumours  affect
                                                                  [6]
               predominantly infants and/or children/adolescents, with RMS being the most frequent, accounting for 50%
               of all STS in childhood .
                                  [2,7]

               Current treatment of STS is largely based on tumour resection followed by chemotherapy and/or
               radiotherapy. This multimodal approach often leads to long-term side effects and, due to resistance to
               cytotoxic agents in large proportion of sarcoma patients, it also results in local recurrence as well as
               metastasis. Despite intensification of treatment regimes, little significant advancement in treatment
               outcomes for high-risk patients with these malignancies has been noted in recent years . The low
                                                                                                [8]
               efficiency/failure of the standard therapies in STS highlights a fundamental necessity for development of
               novel, more effective and less harmful treatment strategies for sarcoma patients.

               ROLE OF EZH2 IN STS
               Enhancer of Zeste Homologue 2 (EZH2) is the catalytic subunit of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2
               (PRC2), a multiprotein complex comprised of four core units, EED, SUZ12, RbBP4, and EZH2, although a
                                                                                                 [9]
               number of other auxiliary proteins have also been shown to modulate PRC2 activity [Figure 1] . PRC2 is
               crucial for maintaining the epigenetic state of the cells through modulation of chromatin structure and by
               such means, regulation of gene expression. EZH2 is a histone methyltransferase whose mode of action is
               observed as addition of methyl groups at lysine 27 in histone H3 through its active SET domain motif,
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63