Page 38 - Read Online
P. 38

Pacheco et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2020;6:49  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.85                    Page 11 of 15

               Pathogenesis
                                                                                    [2]
               No consistent genetic abnormality has been reported for periosteal osteosarcoma .

               Diagnostic ancillary techniques
               Compared to low-grade central osteosarcoma and parosteal osteosarcomas, MDM2 and CDK4 are very
               rarely expressed in periosteal osteosarcoma and therefore they do not seem to be molecules central to the
                                                                                             [47]
               control of cancer development, growth, and progression in this rare subtype of osteosarcoma .
               Main differential diagnosis
               BPOP arising in long bones may be mistaken for a periosteal osteosarcoma, due to its rapid growth, high
               rate of local recurrences and atypical histology [38,39] . BPOP does not exhibit the brisk mitotic activity nor the
               level of cytological atypia observed in periosteal osteosarcomas. In addition, blue bone is a feature of BPOP
               absent in periosteal osteosarcoma.

               Parosteal osteosarcoma arises in metaphysis of long bones in slightly older population. Their radiological
               growth patterns are dissimilar. Microscopically their recognition is usually straightforward due to the fact
               that parosteal osteosarcoma is predominantly fibroblastic, is typically low-grade, and contains abundant
               tumor bone; whereas periosteal osteosarcoma is predominantly chondroblastic and of intermediate to high
               grade.

               Differentiating a periosteal osteosarcoma from a high-grade surface osteosarcoma is of prognostic and
               therapeutic importance, as high-grade surface osteosarcoma behaves in a much more aggressive manner.
               High-grade surface osteosarcomas most frequently arise in metaphysis of long bones of extremities.
               Histologically, periosteal osteosarcoma shows less anaplasia and more prominent chondroid differentiation
               than high-grade surface osteosarcoma. High-grade surface osteosarcoma is a high-grade tumor (grades 3
                                                                                       [2]
               or 4), whereas periosteal osteosarcoma is an intermediate grade tumor (grades 2 or 3) .
               Periosteal chondrosarcoma arises predominantly in metaphyseal locations and in older patients. The
               neoplastic cartilage lacks marked nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic figures are rare, and osteoid or bone
               formed by the neoplastic chondrocytes are absent.

               Treatment and prognosis
               Treatment consists of en bloc resection with wide margins without chemotherapy. Periosteal osteosarcoma
               has less aggressive behavior compared to high-grade osteosarcoma, including a lower propensity for
               systemic recurrence which is reported to be around 15% in periosteal osteosarcoma [21,48] . The 10-year
               overall survival rate is 77.1%-84% [44-46] .

               High-grade surface osteosarcoma
               Definition and clinical features
               High-grade surface osteosarcoma is a high-grade, malignant, bone-forming neoplasm arising in the
               bony surface with minimal or no involvement of the underlying cortical bone. It is the least common
               type of surface osteosarcoma, representing approximately 1% of all osteosarcoma types. It mostly affects
               adolescents and young adults with a peak incidence in the second decade of life and a striking male
                           [1]
               predominance . The skeletal distribution is similar to that of conventional osteosarcoma, most frequently
               involving the metaphysis of the distal femur, proximal tibia, and proximal humerus.

               Imaging
                                                                                                        [1]
               X-rays show mixed non-mineralized and mineralized matrix with fine cloud-like areas of opacity .
               Periosteal reaction is uncommon, and the margins are indistinct [Figure 5]. Up to one third of the tumors
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43