Page 267 - Read Online
P. 267

Mizejewski. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:35  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2018.70                           Page 9 of 11

               some instances, the derived peptide displayed an opposite action from its host protein such as angiogenic
               inhibition versus enhancement of new blood vessel growth. In another type of protein-derived peptide, the
               amino acid segment is not cleaved from the preproprotein, but rather exposed following a conformational
               change of the tertiary folded polypeptide. As an example, metabolic stresses of excessive ligand
               concentrations can temporarily convert the growth enhancing AFP molecule into a growth inhibitory
               protein. The transitory AFP molecule then refolds back to its tertiary form, and full length AFP once again
               displays the property of growth enhancement.

               In the future, it might be feasible to administer short peptides to metastatic patients by injection, infusion,
               and osmotic pumps, or via sublingual routes to patients in early and/or late metastatic disease. Such peptides
               are also capable of down-regulating the expression of metastasis-associated proteins as previously described
                     [44]
               for GIP . Peptides are short half-life molecules with good targeting properties, and adequate target binding
                                          [43]
               (loading/off- loading) affinities . Natural or synthesized peptides might potentially serve as treatment
               adducts in combination with next generation therapeutic cancer drugs. Peptide binding, occupation, down-
               regulation, and saturation of ECM proteins in the interstitium may possibly serve to disable and sever the
               primary tumor and/or metastatic nesting sites from their ECM communication networks.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               The author extends his gratitude and thankfulness to Ms. Jennifer Wright in the typing and processing of
               this manuscript.

               Authors’ contributions
               Mizejewski GJ solely contributed to the article.


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.


               REFERENCES
               1.    Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:9-29.
               2.   Tran-Thanh D, Done SJ. The role of stromal factors in breast tumorigenicity. Am J Pathol 2010;176:1072-74.
               3.   Amicone L, Marchetti A. Microenvironment and tumor cells: two targets for new molecular therapies of hepatocellular carcinoma. Transl
                   Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;3:24.
               4.   Liu Q, Zhang H, Jiang X, Qian C, Liu Z, et al. Factors involved in cancer metastasis: a better understanding to “seed and soil” hypothesis.
   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272