Page 14 - Read Online
P. 14

Page 8 of 14                         Gottlieb et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2018;4:37  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2018.26


                Exon 7                                                    Number of reads
                                                              19,248  7104  3729  1260  6188  2993
                                                                         Number of mutants
                                     AAA AAT CAA
                824   2471A  AA (ins A)         Asn Gln  Lys fs           5
                                     AAA
                                     AAA AAT CAA
                825   2472T  TA (ins A)         Gln    fs                                 21
                                     AAA
                                     AAA AAT CAA
                825   2473C  CA (ins A)         Gln Lys  Gln Lys fs       4
                                     AAA
                Exon 8                                                    Number of reads
                                                              3443   3836  4430  1569  1662  1795
                                                                         Number of mutants
                880   2638T  TT (ins T)  ACT TTT GAC  Asp  Stop      4
                887   2661G  A       ATG GTG    Met    Ile                                2      PCa
                890   2670G  A       GTG CAC    Val    Val                     2          2
                893   2678C  T       TTT CCG GAA  Pro  Leu                     2                 CAIS
                893   2678C  CC (ins C)  TTT CCG GAA  Pro  Pro fs              2
                893   2679G  A       TTT CCG GAA  Pro  Pro                                2
               905    2715C  CC (ins C)  GTG CCC AAG Pro  Pro fs                     3
               n/a: not available; PCa: prostate cancer; CAIS: complete androgen insensitivity syndrome
























               Figure 1. AR exonic mutations present in each of the tumor samples. T- refers to individual tumor samples. AR refers to codon within
               which mutations were found

               present within cancer tissues, but their frequencies have generally not been assessed. This is because it has
               been assumed that such variants are present in most tumor cells and are therefore responsible for the cancer
               phenotype, so that ITGH just reflects the complex genetic makeup of individual tumors, but that the basic
               mutation-centric paradigm still applies. However, evidence that driver gene mutations can also be present
               in normal tissues has considerably confused the role of these driver genes in carcinogenesis. We believe that
               identifying cases of CSGV is likely to be helpful in resolving the phenotype/genotype disconnect, because
               the data will reveal the actual frequency of the variants and put them in context within a tumor. In a previ-
               ous study examining an AR CAG repeat length polymorphism in breast tumors, changes in the frequency
               of these polymorphisms in normal and cancer tissues from individual tumors, as well as in matching blood
               samples were investigated. This revealed the distribution frequencies of different length AR CAG repeat vari-
                                             [6]
               ants associated with carcinogenesis . A similar approach applied to analyzing driver gene CSGV is likely to
               give further information to help elucidate the significant genetic events of carcinogenesis.
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19