Page 40 - Read Online
P. 40

Yang et al. Intell Robot 2022;2(3):223­43  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2022.19  Page 233
                                                   [                  ]
                                                            (  −1) )  ∗
                                                    −(      ⊗      
                                               ¯
                                               Φ =                  (0)  ≺ 0                          (20)
                                                          ¯
                                                         Ξ        Υ   
               hold for any   ,    ∈ O,    ∈ N     , where
                                       [1,          ]
                                 ˜       ¯
                                                            ˜
               ¯
               Ξ = [   ˜              L ˜           0   M ] , Ψ 23 = [(      ⊗       ) 0 0] ,       =       ⊗    + (      L    +    0   M    ) ⊗      ,
                                     
                             ˜
                ˜
                                                                                         (0)
               L    = L    ⊗      , M    = M    ⊗      , Z    =         {      ⊗       ,       ⊗       ,       ⊗       } ∈ R 3        ×3         , Υ    =         {Υ, Υ, Υ},
                                    (  )
                                                            
                                       (0)
               Υ = Σ             (      ⊗       −       ⊗       −       ⊗    ),
                      =1  Σ   ∈O  Ω                         
               then the system (6) is leader-following consensus in mean square sense and possess a H ∞ performance index
                                                                −1   
                                                                         −1
                                                              
                ˆ   . Moreover, the controller gains are given by       = (     )    (   )      .
                                                                        
               Proof Performing congruence transformations         {            ,             , Z ,             } to (9),         {        , Z } to (10), one
                                                                                                
                                                                         
                                                                                                
                                                                         
               can obtain
                                       −(      ⊗       (  −1) )  ∗  ∗      ∗  
                                                                              
                                            0          2                      
                                                     − ˆ                ∗  ∗                        (21)
                                                                   (  )        ≺ 0
                                          Z Ξ        Z Ψ 23   Z P    Z     ∗ 
                                                                  
                                               
                                                          
                                                                              
                                                ⊗       0         0      −             
                                                                              
                                              [                        ]
                                                       (  −1)
                                               −(      ⊗        )  ∗
                                                                        ≺ 0                           (22)
                                                                  ˜
                                                                  (0)
                                                   Z    Ξ     Z P    Z   
                                                                 
               According to the literature [40] , we can obtain that for the positive definite matrix    ∈ R   ×    and the real matrix
                                            
                                            −1
                  ∈ R   ×   , there must be (   −   )    (   −   ) ⪰ 0. Performing cholesky decomposition on the matrix   , there
                                                                                               −1
                                                                     
                                                                                               
               must be a lower triangular matrix    ∈ R   ×    such that    =      . Further, we can get (   −   )    (   −   ) =
                                     
                                                                               
                     ⪰ 0, where    =    −      . When the matrix    is full rank, (   −   )    (   −   ) ≻ 0 holds. Based on
                   
                                       −1
                                                                                −1
               this, the inequalities
                                                             −(  )      (  )
                                                      (      ⊗        )[(      ⊗       ) − (      ⊗       )] ⪰ 0
                                       (0)                   −(0)       (0)
                                [(      ⊗       ) − (      ⊗       )] (      ⊗        )[(      ⊗       ) − (      ⊗       )] ⪰ 0
               can ensure
                                               −(  )         (  )                    
                                   −(      ⊗                 ) ⪯ (      ⊗       ) − (      ⊗       ) − (      ⊗    ),  (23)
                                                                                     
                                             
                                                −(0)          (0)                     
                                    −(      ⊗                 ) ⪯ (      ⊗       ) − (      ⊗       ) − (      ⊗    )
                                              
                                                                                      
               for any   ,    ∈ O,    ∈ N     . Then, it can be shown that the inequalities (21) and (22) can ensure that the
                                   [1,          ]
               conditions (19) and (20) hold. Furthermore, it implies that the inequalities (9) and (10) are true. By Theorem 1,
               we can get that systems (6) and (8) is leader-following consensus in mean square sense with a H ∞ performance
               index ˆ   under the controller (4) and the controller gains       = (     )    (   )      . This proof is completed.
                                                                         −1   
                                                                       
                                                                                  −1
                                                                                 
                                                                                          
                                                             
                                                                                                    
                                                    
               Supposing that the channel inferences    (  ) and    (  ) in (4) are ignored, that is,    (  ) = 0,    (  ) = 0.
                                                     
                                                                                            
                                                           0  
                                                                                                    0
               Then, we have   (  ) = 0 in (6). Consequently, the leader-following consensus control of system (18) under
               semi-Markov switching topology is realized in the following corollary.
                                                                                     (  )             (  )
               Corollary 2 Given a scalar           ∈ N ≥1, if there exist a sets of symmetric matrices        ∈ R       ×       ≻ 0,        ∈
               R       ×       ≻ 0, and matrices       ∈ R       ×       ,       ∈ R       ×       ,   ,    ∈ O,    ∈ N      such that the inequalities hold:
                                                                       [0,          ]
                                           [                              ]
                                                    (  −1)
                                            −(      ⊗        )    ∗
                                                                            ≺ 0
                                                 ¯
                                                 Ξ        −P    −(  )  − Z    − Z   
                                                                           
                                                 [                  ]
                                                          (  −1)
                                                  −(      ⊗        )  ∗
                                                                     ≺ 0
                                                        ¯
                                                       Ξ        Υ    (0)
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45