Page 38 - Read Online
P. 38

Chen et al. Intell Robot 2024;4:179-95  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2024.11      Page 187


                                               Table 1. Parameters of the depth camera
                                                       Camera parameters
                                                  Size        71.9 mm × 19.2 mm × 10.6 mm
                                                Resolution        224 × 172 pixels
                                                Frame rate         Up to 60 fps
                                          Average power consumption  300 mW
                                             Measurement range      0.1 ∼ 4 m
                                                 Weight              13 g




























                  Figure 4. The experiment setup for evaluating the proposed staircase feature extraction method. IMU: Inertial measurement unit.


               in this paper, contributes to reducing absolute trajectory errors in seven out of eight trials. This implies that
               the camera’s estimated motion trajectories, obtained through the proposed method, align more closely with
               the ground truth than trajectories derived solely from extracting convex corner points as features.




               To demonstrate that our feature extraction system is more suitable for visually constrained prosthetic systems,
               we conducted comparative experiments with four repeated trials using the Open3D built-in ICP algorithm [26]
               to obtain relative displacement. In the experiment, to ensure fairness, both our algorithm and Open3D’s al-
               gorithm used the same 2D point cloud. The point cloud was replicated in columns to transform into a 3D
               point cloud for calling Open3D’s built-in ICP method. Based on statistics, the average processing time for
               Open3D ICP algorithm on the replicated five-column point cloud is ∼10 ms, longer than the simplified KNN-
               ICP method within the 2D plane (3 ms). The odometer trajectory estimation and absolute errors for different
               algorithms are shown in Figure 6. The comparison results on the absolute trajectory error and the processing
               time demonstrate that the proposed method can achieve better estimation accuracy and a faster processing
               speed due to the dimension reduction process.



               3.2 Evaluation of the robustness of the proposed method
               To evaluate the robustness of our approach across wider scenarios, we tested it on another staircase with stairs
               that are 27.5 cm wide and 14.5 cm high. The absolute trajectory error results in four repeated trials on this
               higher staircase are presented in Figure 7. The results show that the absolute trajectory errors on both kinds
               of stairs are of the same scale, demonstrating the robustness of the proposed method on various stair sizes.
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43