Page 196 - Read Online
P. 196

Page 8 of 11                                          Nakamura et al. Hepatoma Res 2019;5:16  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2019.06


               Table 6. Summary of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in patients administered direct-acting antivirals after
               hepatocellular carcinoma treatment
                Authors         Number of patients  HCC treatment before DAA  HCC recurrence  Follow-up period
                Reig et al. [4]      58             Hepatectomy 20     16/58 (27.6%)          5.7 months
                                                    Ablation 32
                                                    TACE 6
                Conti et al. [5]     59             Hepatectomy 23     17/59 (28.8%)          24 weeks
                                                    Ablation 28
                                                    TACE 5
                Nagata et al. [7]    83             N/A                SVR: 22.9%/3 years     2.3 years
                                                                       Non-SVR: 40.0%/3 years
                Ikeda et al. [9]     89             Hepatectomy 43     21.8%/2years           20.7 months
                                                    RFA 38
                                                    TACE 4
                                                    PRT 4
                ANRS [10]            189            N/A                8.8%/year              20.2 months
                Minami et al. [13]   27             RFA 27             29.8%/2 year           1.3 years

               HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; DAA: direct-acting antiviral; TACE: transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; PRT: particle radiation
               therapy; RFA: radio-frequency ablation; SVR: sustained virological response

               included patients treated with TACE, which was not a curative treatment; recurrence occurred only in cases treated
               with hepatectomy or RFA before DAA, and no recurrence was reported in cases treated with TACE, possibly
               because of the small number of TACE cases (only 6). Another Italian group also reported that HCC recurrence was
               observed in 17 of 59 (28.8%) cirrhotic patients with a history of previous liver cancer during a 24-week follow-up
                    [5]
               period .
               In contrast to these studies, a French prospective cohort study did not observe an increased risk of HCC recurrence
               after DAA therapy in patients who underwent curative HCC treatment: the rates of recurrence were similar when
               comparing 189 patients who received DAAs (recurrence, n = 24; incidence, 8.8%/year) to 78 patients who did
                                                                [10]
               not receive DAAs (recurrence, n = 16; incidence, 7.9%/year) . A Canadian group examined the effect of HCV
               eradication pre- and post-liver transplantation (LT) and reported that the treatment of HCV with DAAs prior
               to LT (n = 13) enabled an SVR to be achieved in 92.3% of patients with no influence on the HCC progression or
                              [14]
                                                  [15]
               mean waiting time . In 2017, Zanetto et al.  examined the dropout rate from an LT waiting list because of HCC
               progression in HCV-infected patients treated with DAAs. They reported that 2 of 23 DAA-treated patients (8.7%)
               and 1 of 23 controls (4.3%) were registered as dropout events due to HCC progression (P = 0.90) and concluded that
               HCV eradication did not seem to be associated with an increased risk of dropout from the waiting list.


               Several such studies have been reported from Japan [7,9,13] . Minami et al.  examined the recurrence of HCC after
                                                                        [13]
               RFA treatment and noted no difference in the rate or aggressiveness of recurrence between cases treated withs
               DAA (n = 27) and those treated with interferon (n = 38) within 2 years after ablation. Ikeda et al. showed that the
               1- and 2-year recurrence rates after curative treatment for HCC were 18.1% and 25.0%, respectively, in patients with
               DAA therapy and 21.8% and 46.5%, respectively, in those without DAA therapy . Nagata et al.  showed that the
                                                                                           [7]
                                                                               [9]
               rate of cumulative HCC recurrence in patients with an SVR after interferon-free therapy was 28.9% (22/76) during
               a median follow-up period of 2.3 years and concluded that the risks of early HCC recurrence after viral eradication
               were similar between interferon-based and interferon-free therapies. However, the populations of the studies were
               small, and the follow-up periods were short. We therefore tried to eliminate these problems as much as possible by
               increasing the number of cases and prolonging the observation period.

               In the period before the DAA era at our institution, the 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence rates of HCC patients after RFA
               were 23.8%, 56.2% and 68.0%, respectively . A study from Korea  reported that the 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative
                                                [19]
                                                                   [20]
               intrahepatic distant recurrence rates were 24.4%, 59.5% and 73.1%, respectively. These recurrence rates were quite
               similar to those of our study of DAA-treated patients. Considering that the subjects in these studies were limited
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201