Page 64 - Read Online
P. 64

Hung et al.                                                                                                                                                                     Attenuation of liver stiffness by sorafenib

           Table 3: Comparison of SWV, AAR, APRI, FIB-4 and the Lok index at the beginning of sorafenib treatment and 3 to
           6 months after sorafenib treatment
                           Overall (n = 17)             Cirrhosis (n = 10)            Non-cirrhosis (n = 7)
           Group
                    Beginning     After     P     Beginning      After     P      Beginning     After     P
           SWV      2.42 ± 0.78  1.91 ± 0.64  < 0.01  2.49 ± 0.76  2.06 ± 0.73  0.06  2.32 ± 0.87  1.69 ± 0.45  < 0.05
           AAR      1.39 ± 0.64  1.15 ± 0.36  0.05  1.61 ± 0.73  1.19 ± 0.39  0.04  1.10 ± 0.34  1.10 ± 0.36  0.96
           APRI     1.14 ± 1.05  1.31 ± 0.51  0.52  1.07 ± 1.02  1.48 ± 0.53  0.25  1.24 ± 1.16  1.08 ± 0.39  0.70
           FIB-4    3.50 ± 2.45  3.65 ± 1.28  0.77  3.89 ± 2.29  4.38 ± 0.86  0.52  2.94 ± 2.74  2.62 ± 1.05  0.69
           Lok      0.63 ± 1.27  0.41 ± 0.77  0.30  1.16 ± 1.31  0.67 ± 0.65  0.49  -0.13 ± 0.78  0.05 ± 0.83  0.38
           SWV: shear wave velocity, m/sec; AAR: aspartate/alanine aminotransferase ratio; APRI: aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index;
           FIB-4: fibrosis-4 index; Lok: Lok index
           mean SWV was suggestive of the attenuation of liver   comparison. Nevertheless, this study can be viewed
           parenchymal stiffness after sorafenib treatment.   as a pilot study to explore the anti-fibrotic effect of
                                                              sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC.
           Although liver biopsy is a well-known method for
           assessing liver fibrosis, it is not possible to perform   In conclusion, sorafenib has potential anti-fibrotic
           repeated liver biopsy for the assessment of liver   effects and efficacy in patients with advanced HCC.
           fibrosis in patients with advanced HCC because     Large-scale, long-term, and randomized control
           of possible complications and ethical issues. The   studies are needed to confirm the results of this study.
           development of non-invasive methods based on
           serum markers offers an alternative approach for   Authors’ contributions
           clinical practice. These markers are classified as   Study design and ARFI evaluation: M.C. Yu, Y.C. Chen
           direct markers that reflect the pathophysiology of   Data collection and manuscript writing: C.F. Hung, D. Liu
           liver fibrogenesis and represent components of the
           extracellular matrix; indirect markers use routine   Clinical practice for HCC patients as the guideline at
           laboratory data and reflect the consequences of    this institute: T.H. Wu, C.W. Lee, K.T. Pan, C.T. Wang,
           liver damage. [15,25]  However, liver biochemistry and   H.Y. Chai
           platelet counts could change over time in patients with
           deteriorating advanced HCC, and non-invasive serum   Financial support and sponsorship
           markers, such as the AAR, the APRI, the FIB-4 or   This study was supported by the Chang Gung Medical
           the Lok index, may be inadequate for assessing liver   Foundation (CMRPG3D0511-3).
           fibrosis in such patients.
                                                              Conflicts of interest
           With the advantage of combination with conventional   There are no conflicts of interest.
           B-mode ultrasound, ARFI technology can be easily
           used for the evaluation of liver parenchyma free   Patient consent
           of hepatic tumors, blood vessels and bile ducts,   Each patient was informed of the study and gave their
           which cannot be achieved by transient elastography   consent.
                     ®
           (Fibroscan ). Therefore, ARFI elastography may be
           the better choice among non-invasive methods for   Ethics approval
           evaluating the severity and serial changes of liver
           fibrosis during sorafenib treatment.               This study was approved by the Institutional Review
                                                              Board (IRB) of CGMH, Linkou branch (IRB No. 103-
           There are some limitations in the present study. First,   1747B).
           this study is a case-series study, and the number of
           patients is small. However, the stiffness of the liver   REFERENCES
           parenchyma was observed to decrease, as indicated
           by a reduced SWV, after sorafenib treatment.       1.   Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Gastroenterology
           Furthermore, the results of the present study have    2008;134:1655-69.
           provided a basis for future prospective large-scale   2.   Moreno M, Bataller R. Cytokines and renin-angiotensin system
           studies that test the anti-fibrotic efficacy of sorafenib in   3.   signaling in hepatic fibrosis. Clin Liver Dis 2008;12:825-52.
                                                                 Borkham-Kamphorst E, Kovalenko E, van Roeyen CR, Gassler
           the liver parenchyma. Second, the follow-up duration   N, Bomble M, Ostendorf T, Floege J, Gressner AM, Weiskirchen
           may be too short to see long-term changes in SWV or   R. Platelet-derived growth factor isoform expression in carbon
           the stiffness of the liver parenchyma during sorafenib   tetrachloride-induced chronic liver injury. Lab Invest 2008;88:1090-
           treatment. Third, no control group was included for   100.
            56                                                                                                      Hepatoma Research ¦ Volume 3 ¦ March 24, 2017
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69