Page 246 - Read Online
P. 246

Commentary

            Comment on “Preliminary outcome of microwave ablation

            of hepatocellular carcinoma: breaking the 3-cm barrier?”



            Paola Tombesi, Francesca Di Vece, Francesca Ermili, Sergio Sartori
            Section of Interventional Ultrasound, St. Anna Hospital, 44100 Ferrara, Italy.
                          Dr. Paola Tombesi was born on April 27, 1976, and graduated cum laude in 2001. She is specialist in
                          Internal Medicine and is dealing with interventional ultrasonography from 2003. She is working in the
                          Section of Interventional Ultrasound, St. Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy, from 2006, and is author of 61
                          scientific papers.




            Corresponding Author:
            Dr. Paola Tombesi, Section of Interventional Ultrasound, St. Anna Hospital, 44100 Ferrara, Italy. E-mail: p.tombesi@ospfe.it
            Received: 13-07-2016; Accepted: 20-07-2016

            Thamtorawat S, Hicks R, Yu J, Siripongsakun S, Lin WC, Raman S,   experienced thermal ablation technique, but its efficacy is
            McWilliams JP, Douek M, Bahrami S, Lu DSK. Preliminary   well known to decrease in presence of tumors larger than
            outcome  of Microwave  ablation  of  hepatocellular  carcinoma:   2-3 cm. Last generation microwave ablation (MWA) systems
            breaking the 3-cm barrier? J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016;27:623-30.  offer some advantages compared with RFA, such as greater
                                                              intratumoral temperature, deeper penetration of energy,
            Nowadays, surgical resection represents the gold standard   propagation across the  poorly conductive  tissues, less
            for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in   sensitivity to the heat-sink effect, and larger ablation volume.
            eligible patients, and liver transplantation is considered the   These peculiarities could enable to treat larger tumors than
            best option for selected patients with HCC. However, in the   RFA with adequate safety margin. So to date the question
            last years the role of thermal ablation therapies is becoming   is: is it time to break the 3-cm barrier for thermal ablation?
            more and more relevant. Their effectiveness and safety have
            widely been proven, and they play a key role in the treatment   To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies compared
            of HCC patients who are not eligible or poor candidates for   the efficacy of MWA in nodules up to 5 cm with respect to
                                                                                             [8]
                                    [1-4]
            surgery, or who refuse surgery.  Moreover, they can also be   nodules up to 3 cm. Thamtorawat et al.  recently published
            used as a bridge to liver transplantation.        an interesting retrospective study  including 129 patients
                                                              with 173 HCCs up to 5 cm treated with MWA: 118 nodules
            In the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) guidelines   were ≤ 3 cm in size, whereas 55 nodules were from 3.1 to
            for treatment of HCC, tumors up to 3 cm in diameter are   5 cm in size. The reported overall technical success rate of
            considered  eligible for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with   MWA was 96.5%. Local tumor progression occurred in 20/173
            curative intent in non-surgical candidates.  Moreover, recent   tumors (11.6%), and recurrences were successfully retreated
                                            [5]
            studies showed that RFA of very early HCC is as effective as   by additional thermal ablation session. The mean follow-up
            surgical resection in terms of overall survival and recurrence-  period was 11.8 ± 9.8 months. The 1-year and 2-year overall
            free survival rates.  On the basis of these reports and their   survival rates for nodules ≤ 3 cm and for nodules from 3.1 to
                          [6,7]
            own experience, most skilled interventional oncologists   5 cm were 91.3% and 81.7%, respectively. Eighteen patients
            and  radiologists  are  advocating an  update  of  the  current   out of 129 (13.9%) were bridged to liver transplantation.
            guidelines, as it is time to consider  RFA at least equivalent   Interestingly, there was no statistically significant
            to surgical resection in the treatment of HCC up to 2 cm, in   difference in local progression rates between the two
            particular when the liver tumor is centrally located.  groups of HCC, with a 2-year local tumor control of 83.9%
            RFA represents the “historical”, best established and   and 82.1%, respectively.
                                                               This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
                            Access this article online         Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows
                                             Quick Response Code  others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the
              Website:                                         author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
              www.hrjournal.net/                               For reprints contact: service@oaepublish.com

                                                                How  to  cite this  article:  Tombesi P, Di Vece F, Ermili F, Sartori
              DOI:                                              S. Comment on “Preliminary outcome of microwave ablation of
              10.20517/2394-5079.2016.30                        hepatocellular  carcinoma: breaking  the  3-cm  barrier?”  Hepatoma
                                                                Res 2016;2:237-8.
                 © 2016 Hepatoma Research | Published by OAE Publishing Inc.                             237
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251