Page 152 - Read Online
P. 152

Page 4 of 21                 Yang et al. Hepatoma Res 2023;9:48  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2023.68
























                Figure 2. Schematic representation of main therapeutic targets, drugs and signaling pathways for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in
                2023. The next generation sequencing is recommended to define the genomic aberration status before systemic therapy for
                unresectable or metastatic patients. The altered gene textbox highlighted in green indicates that targeted monotherapy, such as anti-
                   Fus
                             Fus
                NTRK  or anti-RET , is recommended by NCCN in first-line or subsequent-line settings. Accordingly, the gene textbox highlighted in
                                                       Fus
                red means that targeted therapy alone, such as anti-FGFR2 , anti-IDH1 Mut , anti-HER2 Amp , or anti-BRAF V600E , is recommended only after
                front-line systemic therapy. All the targeted agents recommended in the NCCN guideline of BTC (version 2. 2023) are displayed in bold
                                                                                Fus
                for better individualized drug selection. IDH1/2 Mut : isocitrate dehydrogenase-1/2 mutation; FGFR2 : fibroblast growth factor receptor 2
                                                                                       Fus
                                                                                                     Fus
                fusion; HER2 Amp : human epidermal growth factor 2 amplification; BRAF V600E : BRAF V600E mutation; NTRK : NTRK fusion; RET : RET
                fusion.
               alterations of FGFR2, BAP1, and IDH1/2 enriched in S4. Compared to subtype S4, S1 presented higher
               CA19-9 levels, more metastasis, and worse prognosis. S3 was identified as a characteristic of HBV infection.
               Therefore, genetic mutation analysis could help recognize the clinicopathological characteristics and even
               prognosis of iCCA.

               Genetic mutation-based tumor microenvironment and heterogeneity
               ITH is a ubiquitous phenomenon in various types of cancer, as reported by Dentro et al., who showed that
               at least one subclonal expansion was found in over 75% of samples across all 38 cancer types except
               melanoma . Recently, multi-region sequencing has revealed that iCCA exhibits extremely high ITH at
                        [21]
                                                                 [22]
               both the genomic and immune microenvironment levels . The differences in gene mutations and copy
               number changes exceed 40% between different regions of the same tumor, and more than half of iCCAs
               exhibit heterogeneous tumor-infiltrating immunity. iCCA driven by FGFR2 mutations has a lower
               neoantigen load and immune infiltration, suggesting that PD1 antibodies may need to be combined with
               FGRF2 inhibitors to achieve some efficacy in this situation. In addition, researchers screened the HLA
               binding ability and immunogenicity of immune peptides derived from TP53, KRAS, IDH1/2, and BAP1
               mutations,  and  found  that  the  peptide  LVVVGADGV  derived  from  KRAS  G12D  has  strong
               immunogenicity and may serve as a new target for personalized immunotherapy. Actually, extensive ITH
               existed in iCCA at multiple levels, including genomics, transcriptomics, and the immune system. IDH-
               mutant iCCA displays increased ITH and colder tumor microenvironment (TME) . Lin et al. employed
                                                                                      [23]
               multiomics analysis to categorize 255 iCCA patients into three immune subgroups: IG1 (suppressive in
                                                                   [24]
               25.1%), IG2 (exclusion in 42.7%), and IG3 (activated in 32.2%) . These subgroups exhibited distinct genetic
               and molecular characteristics. Subgroup IG1 had the poorest prognosis, with the highest degree of bone
               marrow infiltration and abundant KRAS mutations. Evidently, TME and ITH have emerged as pivotal
               factors leading to resistance and failure of systemic therapies. Genetic mutation features may help not only
               guide targeted therapy but also provide further understanding of the TME and ITH of iCCA.
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157