Page 74 - Read Online
P. 74

Mazzapioda et al. Energy Mater 2023;3:300019  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2023.03  Page 25 of 30

               contact among the battery components, is expected to be improved. By using solely inorganic compounds,
               enhancement of mechanical stability is difficult. In contrast, the combination of organic and inorganic
               materials in QSSEs allows the design of flexible materials, which can be folded, cut, and wearable; these
               advantages are important for the implementation of QSSEs in commercial applications. So far, a limited
               number of ILE or PE for QSSE have been tested; hence, advancements in the design of novel and cost-
               effective QSSE are anticipated.

               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgements
               Henry Adenusi acknowledges the Hong Kong Quantum AI Lab Limited, AIR@InnoHK of the Hong Kong
               government for supporting his fellowship.


               Authors’ contributions
               Proposed the topic of this review: Passerini S
               Prepared the manuscript: Mazzapioda L
               Collectively discussed and revised the manuscript: Mazzapioda L, Tsurumaki A, Di Donato G, Adenusi H,
               Navarra MA, Passerini S


               Financial support and sponsorship
               This work was supported by the Helmholtz Association.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               ©TheAuthor(s) 2023.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Scrosati B, Garche J. Lithium batteries: status, prospects and future. J Power Sources 2010;195:2419-30.  DOI
               2.       Armand M, Tarascon JM. Building better batteries. Nature 2008;451:652-7.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Passerini S, Scrosati B. Lithium and lithium-ion batteries: challenges and prospects. Electrochem Soc Interface 2016;25:85-7.  DOI
               4.       Kalhoff J, Eshetu GG, Bresser D, Passerini S. Safer electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries: state of the art and perspectives.
                    ChemSusChem 2015;8:2154-75.  DOI
               5.       Chen Y, Kang Y, Zhao Y, et al. A review of lithium-ion battery safety concerns: the issues, strategies, and testing standards. J Energy
                    Chem 2021;59:83-99.  DOI
               6.       Xu W, Wang J, Ding F, et al. Lithium metal anodes for rechargeable batteries. Energy Environ Sci 2014;7:513-37.  DOI
               7.       Wang H, Yu D, Kuang C, et al. Alkali metal anodes for rechargeable batteries. Chem 2019;5:313-38.  DOI
               8.       Adenusi H, Chass GA, Passerini S, Tian KV, Chen G. Lithium batteries and the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) - progress and
                    outlook. Adv Energy Mater 2023;13:2203307.  DOI
               9.       Jha V, Krishnamurthy B. Modeling the SEI layer formation and its growth in lithium-ion batteries (LiB) during charge-discharge
                    cycling. Ionics 2022;28:3661-70.  DOI
               10.       Lewis JA, Tippens J, Cortes FJQ, Mcdowell MT. Chemo-mechanical challenges in solid-state batteries. Trends Chem 2019;1:845-57.
                    DOI
               11.       Donato G, Ates T, Adenusi H, Varzi A, Navarra MA, Passerini S. Electrolyte measures to prevent polysulfide shuttle in lithium-
                    sulfur batteries. Batteries Supercaps 2022;5:e202200097-121.  DOI
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79