Page 65 - Read Online
P. 65

Wang et al. Carbon Footprints 2024;3:14  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cf.2024.19  Page 17 of 19

               Compared to the EDGAR inventory, the HEI-CD model offered greater spatial resolution and precise point
               source information, which was better suited for urban carbon monitoring and policy-making at the city
               scale. The inventory will not only support the accurate inversion of CO  emission flux but also serve as a
                                                                             2
               crucial tool for guiding effective carbon reduction strategies.


               Future work should focus on further refining the inventory through the introduction of additional data
               sources, enhancing validation systems, and ensuring adaptability to the dynamic nature of city
               environments. This will solidify its role in supporting Chengdu and similar cities in their efforts toward
               carbon neutrality.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Wang R
               Performed data acquisition, as well as providing administrative, technical, and material support: Zhang Y,
               Zhao S, Wang X

               Availability of data and materials
               The data presented in this work are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               This  work  was  supported  by  the  National  Key  Research  and  Development  Program  of  China
               (2022YFE0209100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42307129), and the Zhejiang
               Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LZJMZ24D050005).

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2024.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Filonchyk M, Peterson MP, Zhang L, Hurynovich V, He Y. Greenhouse gases emissions and global climate change: examining the
                   influence of CO , CH , and N O. Sci Total Environ 2024;935:173359.  DOI  PubMed
                                 4
                                      2
                             2
               2.       Rogelj J, den Elzen M, Höhne N, et al. Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature
                   2016;534:631-9.  DOI
               3.       Ward DS, Mahowald NM. Contributions of developed and developing countries to global climate forcing and surface temperature
                   change. Environ Res Lett 2014;9:074008.  DOI
               4.       Wei T, Yang S, Moore JC, et al. Developed and developing world responsibilities for historical climate change and CO  mitigation.
                                                                                                  2
                   Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:12911-5.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               5.       Shafique M, Azam A, Rafiq M, Luo X. Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles: a case
                   study of Hong Kong. Res Transp Econ 2022;91:101112.  DOI
               6.       Bui M, Adjiman CS, Bardow A, et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy Environ Sci 2018;11:1062-176.
                   DOI
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70