Page 125 - Read Online
P. 125

Ponnusamy et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2019;2:297-312  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2018.11                                      Page 309

               FUTURE DIRECTION AND CONCLUSION
               Acquired chemoresistance in general involves a broad range of poorly-comprehended domains (genetic-
               epigenetic) and different partners that cross-talk within and between domains that underwrite the need
               for an integrated approach. Strong body of evidence exists to support the role of epigenetic changes that
               contribute to cellular reprogramming (leading to EMT and CSC phenotype) during acquired resistance
               development. Though the existing reports support the functional role of EMT and associated signaling
               in cancer stemness, the question of whether EMT solely drive stemness to induce chemoresistance in the
               face of co-existing genetic-epigenetic landscape remain to be explored. Nevertheless, addressing epigenetic
               regulation associated with cellular reprogramming is important in the context of chemo-resistance and
               breast cancer treatment. A better understanding of the dynamic epigenetic regulatory network in initiating
               and stabilizing the EMT-CSC signaling in breast cancer is needed. This will help designing better therapies
               that address not only the genetic changes but also the reversible epigenetic changes during the transient
               process of EMT and stemness.



               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Concepted: Ponnusamy L, Singh KP
               Designed: Ponnusamy L, Singh KP
               Wrote (first draft): Ponnusamy L
               Wrote, reviewed, discussed, edited, and revised: Ponnusamy L, Mahalingaiah PKS, Chang YW, Singh KP


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Tong CWS, Wu M, Cho WCS, To KKW. Recent advances in the treatment of breast cancer. Front Oncol 2018;8:227.
               2.   Wind NS, Holen I. Multidrug resistance in breast cancer: from in vitro models to clinical studies. Int J Breast Cancer 2011;2011:967419.
               3.   Hong D, Fritz AJ, Zaidi SK, Van Wijnen AJ, Nickerson JA, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells contribute to
                   breast cancer heterogeneity. J Cell Physiol 2018;233:9136-44.
               4.   Mansoori B, Mohammadi A, Davudian S, Shirjang S, Baradaran B. The different mechanisms of cancer drug resistance: a brief review.
                   Adv Pharm Bull 2017;7:339-48.
               5.   Housman G, Byler S, Heerboth S, Lapinska K, Longacre M, et al. Drug resistance in cancer: an overview. Cancers (Basel) 2014;6:1769-92.
               6.   Wainwright EN, Scaffidi P. Epigenetics and cancer stem cells: unleashing, hijacking, and restricting cellular plasticity. trends cancer
                   2017;3:372-86.
               7.   Skrypek N, Goossens S, De Smedt E, Vandamme N, Berx G. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition: epigenetic reprogramming driving
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130