Page 198 - Read Online
P. 198

Page 694                                  Alonso-Peña et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2019;2:680-709  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2019.006

               Table 6. Germline (G) and somatic (S) mutations affecting coding (c) and non-coding (nc) regions of repair genes in primary
               liver cancer
                               Genetic           Protein   Functional
               Gene    Protein        G/S Region                       Clinical consequences  Studies  References
                              mutation          mutation  consequences
               APEX1  APE1    c.444T>G  G  c   Asp148Glu  ND         Cisplatin resistance  HCC patients [131]
               BRCA1 BRCA1    c.185delT  G  c           High         Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                              c.5503C>T  S  c  Arg1835*  Moderate    Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                              c.1961delA  S  c  Lys654fs*47 ND       Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                              c.5153G>T  S  c  Trp1718Leu  Moderate  Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                             c.2293G>A  S  c   Glu765Lys  ND         Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                                       S   c   Asp825fs*21 ND        Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
               BRCA2 BRCA2   c. 6503delT G  c           High         Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                             c. 6174delT  G  c          High         Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                             c.9976A>T  S  c   Lys3326*  Moderate    Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                                       S   c   Leu2368fs*8 ND        Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                                       S   c   Asn991fs*3 ND         Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                             c.9154C>T  S  c   Arg3052Trp Moderate   Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
                             c.9257G>C  S  c   Gly3086Ala ND         Better OS. Therapy response CCA patients [132]
               ERCC1  ERCC1  c.133A>G  S   c   Ser45Gly  ND          ND                 HCC patients cBioportal
                             c.43G>T   S   c   Gly15Trp  ND          ND                 HCC patients cBioportal
               ERCC2/ ERCC2/  c.1450A>G  S  c  Thr484Ala  ND         ND                 HCC patients cBioportal
               XPD   XPD     c.215A>T  S   c   Tyr72Phe  ND          ND                 HCC patients cBioportal
                             c.1853T>G  S  c   Val618Gly  ND         ND                 HCC patients cBioportal
                             c.1378A>G  S  c   Thr460Ala  ND         ND                 HCC patients cBioportal
               NHEJ1  NHEJ1/XLF c.518C>T  S  c  Thr173Met  ND        ND                 HCC patients cBioportal
               XRCC1 XRCC1   c.580C>T   G  c   Arg194Trp  ND         Cisplatin resistance  HCC patients [131]

               Data obtained from cBioportal and referred literature. Functional consequences are based on VEP (Variant Effect Predictor; https://
               www.ensembl.org/vep) impact: High means that the variant is supposed to cause a high disruptive impact in the protein, which is likely
               to cause loss of function; Moderate means that the variant may be not disruptive, but results in a decrease effectiveness of the encoded
               protein; Modifier is usually referred to non-coding variants, whose impact is difficult to determine, although they can be involved in
               transcription or splicing changes. CCA: cholangiocarcinoma; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; OS: overall survival; ND: not determined


               Germline mutations in several genes belonging to DNA repair pathways are more common in CCA.
               Variants in BRCA and RAD51 genes (HR pathway) and in MHL1 and MSH2 genes (MRR repair pathway)
               have been found in 11% of CCA analyzed , although a relationship between these mutations and treatment
                                                  [133]
               response or OS has been rarely reported. In a multicenter retrospective study of CCA patients, improved
               OS in patients harboring pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations treated with platinum-based therapy and/or PARP
               inhibitors (PARPi) have been described . This suggests that CCA patients could benefit from targeted
                                                  [132]
               therapy, such as PARPi administration, as occurs in other BRCA-associated tumors .
                                                                                      [134]
               Somatic pharmacogenetics
               Somatic mutations in NER genes are rarely found in HCC. ERCC1, one of the key components in this repair
               mechanism, is mutated at low frequency (< 1%). In a cohort of 372 HCC samples collected by TCGA only
               two ERCC1 mutations (c.133A>G; p.Ser45Gly and c.43G>T; p.Gly15Trp) were found in two tumors, even
               though the functional consequences are unknown. However, this gene is frequently overexpressed in HCC
               tumors, being associated with cisplatin resistance . Another essential NER protein, responsible for DNA
                                                         [135]
               damage recognition, is XPC, which is also overexpressed in HCC and could be related to chemoresistance .
                                                                                                       [136]
               Nevertheless, XPC mutations with clinical relevance have not been reported in HCC. The XPD (or ERCC2)
               gene encodes a DNA helicase also involved in this pathway. Four non-synonymous mutations were found in
               XPD in the TCGA HCC cohort. The biological effect of these mutations and their impact on HCC patients
               regarding their response to chemotherapeutic drugs and OS is not known. However, in bladder cancer, non-
               synonymous mutations in XPD have been associated with sensitivity to cisplatin .
                                                                                   [137]
               Mechanisms involved in the repairing of double-strand breaks, such as HR and NHEJ, are also important in
               the response to anticancer drugs . XRCC4-like factor (XLF) is a core member of NHEJ pathway required
                                           [138]
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203