Page 165 - Read Online
P. 165

Belizario et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2019;2:527-38  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2018.009                                            Page 529

               abundant presence of immune cells: T cells, myeloid cells, monocytes, and the second little or no presence
                                             [19]
               of immune cells, especially T cells . Fibroblast cell types are part of TEM, and more precisely cancer-
                                                                                                       [20]
               associated fibroblasts (CAFs) have pro-tumor functions in breast cancer as they can enhance metastasis .
               The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in TME is associated with an overall patient good
                                                                               [19]
               prognosis, better survival and the success of checkpoint immunotherapy . Studies performed a multi-
               omic analysis of Tumor Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets have allowed identification at least
                                                    [21]
               six immune subtypes across cancer types . Finally, stromal cells and immune cells can preserve the
               properties of cancer stem cells (CSCs), or cancer initiating cells, which are cells that exert multicellular
               functions in tumor tissue-specific networks and immune resistance [22,23] . More important, CSCs display
               differentiation-state plasticity that allow cancer cells to undergo epithelial to mesenchymal transition
                                                                                           [24]
               (EMT), a process in which cancer cells acquire migratory and invasive properties . These results
               underline the importance of immunophenotyping as a new modality to sub-classify cancers based on their
               TME  [19,20] .

               The effectiveness of the targeted therapy strongly depends on both the cancer type and molecular
               features of the individual tumors [25,26] . The context-specific impact of molecular features such as somatic
               alterations and/or copy number events can be measured using diverse high-throughput techniques such as
               transcriptomics (the number of counts of mRNA molecules) and (phospho) proteomic and transcription
               factor (TF) activities [27,28] . The reverse phase protein array (RPPA) is a high-throughput antibody-based
               technique, similar to Western blot, to evaluate protein activities in signaling networks [27,28] . This functional
               proteomic analysis can be done in either flash-frozen or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue
               samples. The use of RPPA data for evaluation of functional signatures linking perturbations in down- and
                                                                                                     [18]
               up-stream signal transduction pathways might be crucial for personalizing cancer therapies in future .
               Computational integrative methods that combine genomic and functional cancer phenotypes may better
               predict those patients who will benefit of the combination therapies [27,28] . This system biology approach
               generally uses statistical/mathematical modeling and supervised machine learning for learning and predict
               disease similarities from basic and clinical data. Personalized disease subnetworks may be necessary to
               uncover cancer-related associations, including genotype-phenotype relationships and spatial heterogeneity
               in the tumor microenvironmental interactions [4,27,28] . However, although powerful, the use of these
               methodologies still requires additional strategies to reveal functionally important biomarkers, which often
               remains the rate-limiting step in the diagnostic challenge. Here we will discuss these issues using as model
               the breast cancer tumors.


               BREAST CANCER SUBTYPES AND THERAPY OUTCOMES
               Breast cancer has the highest incidence in women worldwide and is the fifth leading cause of mortality in
               the globe. Many breast cancer classifications have been proposed according to the invasive characteristics,
               occurrence, histology and molecular profiling of tumor samples [29,30] . Based on their site of occurrence,
               tumors can be classified as lobular (located at breast lobules) or ductal (at breast ducts). Carcinomas
               may also arise from invasive epithelial cells (medullary carcinoma), mucus-producing cells (mucinous
               carcinoma, also called colloid carcinoma), or a subtype of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive
               ductal carcinoma (tubular carcinoma). The in situ to invasive breast carcinoma progression is often caused
               by interactions among epithelial, myoepithelial, and stromal cells. The progression occurs due to the loss of
               normal myoepithelial cell function .
                                             [31]

               Cancers derived from luminal cells are the most common types of breast cancer expressing hormone
               receptors for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or the amplified human epidermal
               growth factor receptor (EGFR) 2/erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 receptor (HER2/
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170