Page 55 - Read Online
P. 55

Page 154                                                     Sendino et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2018;1:139-63 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2018.09

               vestigations are required to address several salient questions on the use of XPO1 inhibition as a therapeutic
               approach.


               On one hand, novel XPO1 inhibitors with more favorable clinical properties are being developed. In this
               regard, a “second-generation” SINE (KPT-8602 or Eltanexor) has demonstrated improved tolerability in
               preclinical models [203-205]  and is currently undergoing clinical evaluation.

               On the other hand, it is necessary to further elucidate the mechanisms that mediate the oncogenic role of
               XPO1 alterations (overexpression or mutation) in different types of cancer and to better characterize the
               molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the effect of XPO1 inhibitors. This basic mechanistic infor-
               mation, which is still rather limited, would be crucial to successfully implement XPO1-targeting drugs in
               the clinic, as it could help to design rational combinations with other agents, to identify subsets of patients
               that may benefit more from the treatment and to improve the clinical management of adverse effects.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               We thank our colleagues at the UPV/EHU Dr. Sonia Bañuelos (Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biol-
               ogy), Dr. Gorka Prieto (Dept. of Communication Engineering) and Dr. Asier Fullaondo (Dept. of Genetics,
               Physical Anthropology and Animal Physiology) for their help in preparing Figures 2 and 3. Supported by
               grants from the Spanish Government MINECO-FEDER (SAF2014-57743-R), the Basque Country Govern-
               ment (IT634-13) and the University of the Basque Country (UFI11/20), as well as a fellowship from the
               Basque Country Government (to MS).

               Authors’ contributions


               Conception of the work, draft and revision of the work: Sendino M, OmaetxebarriaMJ, RodríguezJA
               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2018.



               REFERENCES
               1.   Fukuda M, Asano S, Nakamura T, Adachi M, Yoshida M, Yanagida M, Nishida E. CRM1 is responsible for intracellular transport medi-
                   ated by the nuclear export signal. Nature 1997;390:308-11.
               2.   Fornerod M, Ohno M, Yoshida M, Mattaj IW. CRM1 is an export receptor for leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Cell 1997;90:1051-
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60