Page 85 - Read Online
P. 85

Page 701                                         Sharma et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2023;6:688-708  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2023.82

               exhaustion, and modulating the immunosuppressive TME in glioblastoma. A complex disease, such as
               glioblastoma, would require a complex solution. Multidisciplinary approaches involving nanodrug carriers,
               focused ultrasound, plus temporary BBB permeability enhancement technologies (micro-bubbles,
               phototherapy) in combination with gene and immuno-therapy will likely lead to an improved outcome
               [Figure 3]. In addition, a much less traveled path is to enhance glioblastoma neoantigen formation.
               Glioblastoma tumors have a relatively lower TMB, which was shown to correlate with immunotherapy
               outcomes in solid tumors [76,196] . Lower TMB results in lower neoantigen generation, which enables a stealth
               mode of glioblastoma cells. Therefore, increasing the formation of neoantigens may significantly promote
               tumor recognition and clearance by the immune system . Besides T cells, strategies to activate other
                                                                 [197]
               infiltrating immune cells (TAMs, microglia, and MDSCs) that reside in the glioma TME in large abundance
               may effectively reverse the local immunosuppression. Finally, a more precise tumor stratification approach
               and improved prognostic biomarkers will help determine the most effective combinatorial therapies for
               glioblastoma treatment.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Conceptualization, investigation, writing: Sharma S, Chepurna O
               Conceptualization, supervision, writing: Sun T

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2023.

               REFERENCES
               1.       Tran B, Rosenthal MA. Survival comparison between glioblastoma multiforme and other incurable cancers. J Clin Neurosci
                    2010;17:417-21.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma
                    characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 2010;17:98-110.  DOI
               3.       Verdugo E, Puerto I, Medina MÁ. An update on the molecular biology of glioblastoma, with clinical implications and progress in its
                    treatment. Cancer Commun 2022;42:1083-111.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               4.       Wen PY, Weller M, Lee EQ, et al. Glioblastoma in adults: a society for neuro-oncology (SNO) and European society of neuro-
                    oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2020;22:1073-113.  DOI  PubMed
                    PMC
               5.       Drakulic D, Schwirtlich M, Petrovic I, et al. Current opportunities for targeting dysregulated neurodevelopmental signaling pathways
                    in glioblastoma. Cells 2022;11:2530.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               6.       Perez A, Huse JT. The evolving classification of diffuse gliomas: World Health Organization updates for 2021. Curr Neurol Neurosci
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90