Page 69 - Read Online
P. 69

Page 14 of 19                                                  Lin et al. Cancer Drug Resist. 2026;9:14





               outcomes as a common mode of failure, underscoring the need for methodological improvements and
               greater standardization .
                                  [76]
               CLINICAL-STAGE NANO-IMMUNOTHERAPY FORMULATIONS EVALUATED WITH PD-1/PD-L1

               BLOCKADE
               Based on recent clinical studies, nanotechnology-enabled immunotherapy strategies combined with
               PD-1/PD-L1 blockade can be broadly categorized into two major classes: (i) systemically administered
               cancer vaccines delivered via NPs; and (ii) intratumorally administered particulate formulations intended to
               enhance and potentially restore responsiveness to PD-1-based therapy.


               The personalized neoantigen mRNA is delivered using LNPs, and is used in combination with the anti-PD-1
               monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab for the treatment of PD-1 inhibitor-resistant melanoma. In the
               KEYNOTE-942 clinical trial, an open-label, randomized phase IIb study involving patients with cutaneous
               melanoma at high risk of recurrence after complete surgical resection, researchers compared adjuvant
               treatment with personalized neoantigen mRNA therapy mRNA-4157 (V940) plus pembrolizumab vs.
               pembrolizumab alone. The mRNA-4157 (V940) vaccine was encapsulated in LNPs to enable efficient
               delivery. Combination therapy prolonged relapse-free survival (RFS), with 18-month RFS rates of 79% and
               62%, respectively, while maintaining a manageable safety profile .
                                                                    [84]

               Another example is the combination therapy of virus-like particle (VLP)-based TLR9 ligand vidutolimod
               (CMP-001) and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab. In the dose-escalation phase of a phase Ib
               clinical trial, patients with advanced melanoma whose disease had progressed after anti-PD-1
               immunotherapy received intratumoral vidutolimod, a CpG-A TLR9 agonist formulated using VLPs, together
               with intravenous pembrolizumab. The treatment showed an acceptable safety profile, and 25% of patients
               achieved durable clinical responses. Notably, tumor volume was reduced not only in injected lesions but also
               in noninjected lesions, including visceral metastases .
                                                          [85]

               In advanced melanoma, intratumoral administration of the nanocomplex BO-112, a poly I:C formulation
               complexed with polyethyleneimine, has also been evaluated in combination with intravenous
               pembrolizumab in the phase II SPOTLIGHT-203 trial in patients with acquired resistance to PD-1 inhibitors.
               In the intention-to-treat population, the independently assessed objective response rate was 25% , including
               10% complete response and 15% partial responses. The median time to progression was 3.7 months and an
               overall survival probability of 54% at 24 months. Safety was acceptable, with no treatment-related fatal
               adverse events reported . Although this trial addresses acquired resistance to PD-1 blockade rather than
                                   [86]
               primary resistance, it illustrates how nano-enabled immune stimulation strategies are being explored
               clinically in PD-1-refractory populations.

               Based on the recent literature, clinical-stage nano-strategies directly designed to counter tumor-intrinsic
               resistance pathways, such as Wnt/β-catenin, PTEN/PI3K-AKT, or defects in IFN signaling, remain scarce.
               Most pathway-matched nanosystems, including PTEN mRNA NPs, PD-1 membrane decoys, and PD-L1
               siRNA NPs, are still at the preclinical stage. This gap highlights the need for biomarker-driven trial designs
               and scalable, regulatory-ready formulations.


               CONCLUSION
               Primary (intrinsic) resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade remains a major barrier to durable responses across
               cancer types. Mechanistically, primary resistance can arise from tumor intrinsic alterations (e.g., defects in
               IFN signaling, PTEN loss with PI3K/AKT activation, or Wnt/β-catenin-associated immune exclusion) and


                                                           62
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74