Page 50 - Read Online
P. 50

Page 4 of 29                    Novati et al. Ageing Neur Dis 2022;2:17  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/and.2022.19

               and mice are closely related species, but still have genetic and physiological differences, such as the distinct
               expression pattern and localization of certain protein isoforms. These diversities lead to some variance
               between both species in resembling human pathological processes, making rat models a meaningful
               complement to mouse models. This section discusses the commonly used genetic rat models for AD, PD,
               and HD [Table 1], and describes to what extent they recapitulate the characteristic protein aggregate
               pathology.

               Neuropathological phenotypes in genetic rat models of Alzheimer’s disease: APP NL-G-F  knock-in, TgF344-AD
               and McGill-R-Thy1-APP transgenic rats
               Amyloid  plaques  containing  Aβ  peptide  and  neurofibrillary  tangles  (NFTs)  consisting  of
               hyperphosphorylated microtubule-associated protein (tau) make up the typical protein aggregate forms in
               AD. While some studies suggested that tangles may precede plaques, it is commonly accepted that the
                                                                               [49]
               amyloid plaques are formed first and trigger tau agglomeration (see review ). Nevertheless, both amyloid
               plaque and tau tangles are characteristic features of AD. The development of amyloid plaques appears to be
               dependent on the initial accumulation of Aβ, which is derived from amyloid beta precursor protein (APP)
               through sequential proteolytic cleavage by β and γ-secretase. Mutations in APP close to the main APP
               cleavage site and in the catalytic subunit of γ-secretase presenilin (PSEN) are major genetic causes of familial
               AD [50,51] . Ultimately, overexpression of APP with a combination of multiple mutations has been used to
               generate APP transgenic models [52-54] , while double transgenic models expressing mutant APP and mutant
                                                      [36]
               PSEN represent APP/PSEN models (see review ).

               Many transgenic APP mouse models recapitulate amyloid plaque formation and disease manifestation of
               AD and have thereby made essential contributions to understanding Aβ pathology in familial AD. In
               comparison, APP rat models often develop less accumulation of Aβ peptide and amyloid plaques. This
               cannot be simply explained by lower expression levels of transgenes in rats, or different transgene protein
               isoforms, or the applied promoters. One rat model, however, displays full amyloid pathology. Leon et al.
               developed an APP transgenic rat model expressing hAPP751 under the control of the murine Thy1.2
                                                                                                [55]
               promoter and containing the Swedish and Indiana mutations of APP (McGill-R-Thy1-APP rats) . This rat
               model carries one copy of the transgene hemizygously and accordingly presents approximately double the
               amount of APP protein (i.e., both endogenous and transgenic) as wild-type rats. Homozygous rats show an
               early-onset and progressive accumulation of Aβ peptide starting at 1 week of age and develop extracellular
               Aβ deposition at 6 months of age. Particularly, at 20 months of age, McGill-R-Thy1-APP transgenic rats
               display dense-core plaques in most brain areas with predominant presence in the entorhinal and parietal
               cortices, and hippocampus, the typical brain structures that are vulnerable to AD [56-58] . In summary, despite
               the lower expression level of the transgene, McGill-R-Thy1-APP transgenic rats develop early-onset,
               progressive, characteristic amyloid plaque pathology making this model valuable for studying Aβ
               pathogenesis in a close to physiological condition.


               In fact, the distribution and burden of amyloid plaques in AD patients do not correlate with neuronal loss,
               disease severity, or disease duration. In contrast, NFT formation strongly correlates with neuronal death
               and follows a typical progression from the frontal cortex and the CA1 area of hippocampus to the
               anterodorsal thalamus, and in later stages (IV), the CA4 region of hippocampus [59,60] . Instead, NFTs have
                                                                                                  [36]
               only been found in AD mouse models carrying human mutant tau, mostly with P301L mutation . P301L
               missense mutation in tau is the genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to
               chromosome 17 (FTDP-17); this mutation causes tau hyperphosphorylation and its subsequent aggregation
               into NFTs [61,62] . Different from FTDP-17, tau is not the only hyperphosphorylated neuronal protein in AD,
               and hyperphosphorylated tau is the result of a protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation unbalance (see
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55