Page 25 - Read Online
P. 25

Li et al. Ageing Neur Dis 2022;2:13  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/and.2022.13     Page 3 of 13


























                                      Figure 1. Comparison of brain structures of mouse, pig, and human.

                                                       [7,8]
               larger litter size (about 10-12 piglets per litter) . Moreover, fully established somatic cell nuclear transfer
               (SCNT) technology combined with recently developed genome editing technology has made it possible to
               efficiently generate genetically modified pig models  [Figure 2]. Here, we briefly discuss how to use related
                                                           [9]
               techniques to establish genetically modified pig models and review the established pig models for
               neurological diseases.


               METHODS FOR GENERATING GENETICALLY MODIFIED PIG MODELS
               For a long period of time, there have been two main methods to establish genetically modified pig models:
               embryonic microinjection and SCNT. Microinjection is a traditional method for creating transgenic
               animals and involves injecting DNA material directly into the pronucleus and transferring the early embryo
               into the surrogate mother to create a transgenic animal, which introduces transgenes randomly into the
               genome of the resulting offspring . This method is fairly straightforward, but the efficiency of producing
                                            [10]
               transgenic animals is relatively low, about 10% in mice, 4% in rabbits, and only 2%-3% in pigs [11,12] . Although
               several strategies have been used to improve the efficiency of embryonic microinjection, including pronuclei
               or cytoplasmic injection of DNA or mRNA [13,14] , there are still many difficulties in using this method to
               generate genetically modified pig models. For example, due to the high lipid content and low transparency
               in pig oocytes , it is difficult to perform embryonic microinjection. In addition, this method will lead to
                           [15]
               random integration and poor precision of gene targeting. To improve the accuracy of gene editing,
               researchers developed a gene targeting strategy using homologous recombination (HR) in embryonic stem
               (ES) cells, which greatly improves the efficiency of generating gene-targeted animal models [16,17] . The lack of
               ES cells in pigs hinders the generation of precise genetically modified pig models. To overcome this
               difficulty, researchers firstly screen and identify the precisely targeted transgenes in cultured pig cells and
               then use them for SCNT, making it possible to establish gene-targeted pig models. However, the efficiency
               of HR in modifying pig somatic cells is very low, and the fatality rate is high due to the intrinsic genetic
               defects . Later, an attempt to improve the efficiency of pig gene targeting was made by the application of
                     [18]
               several important technologies, including the delivery of gene-targeting vectors using recombinant adeno-
               associated virus (rAAV) [19,20] .


               GENOME EDITING TOOLS
               Due to low targeting efficiency, for a long time, only a few transgenic pig models had been successfully
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30