Page 36 - Read Online

Talwar et al. Art Int Surg. 2025;5:418-24 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2025.22 Page 424

REFERENCES
1. Huerta S, Varshney A, Patel PM, Mayo HG, Livingston EH. Biological mesh implants for abdominal hernia repair: US Food and Drug
Administration approval process and systematic review of its efficacy. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:374-81. DOI PubMed
2. Gillies M, Anthony L, Al-Roubaie A, Rockliff A, Phong J. Trends in incisional and ventral hernia repair: a population analysis from
2001 to 2021. Cureus. 2023;15:e35744. DOI PubMed PMC
3. Talwar AA, Desai AA, McAuliffe PB, et al. Optimal computed tomography-based biomarkers for prediction of incisional hernia
formation. Hernia. 2024;28:17-24. DOI PubMed PMC
4. McAuliffe PB, Desai AA, Talwar AA, et al. Preoperative computed tomography morphological features indicative of incisional hernia
formation after abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2022;276:616-25. DOI PubMed
5. Love MW, Warren JA, Davis S, et al. Computed tomography imaging in ventral hernia repair: can we predict the need for myofascial
release? Hernia. 2021;25:471-7. DOI PubMed
6. Elhage SA, Deerenberg EB, Ayuso SA, et al. Development and validation of image-based deep learning models to predict surgical
complexity and complications in abdominal wall reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2021;156:933-40. DOI PubMed PMC
7. Taye MM. Theoretical understanding of convolutional neural network: concepts, architectures, applications, future directions.
Computation. 2023;11:52. DOI
8. O’Shea K, Nash R. An introduction to convolutional neural networks. arXiv. 2015;arXiv:1511.08458. Available from http://arxiv.org/
abs/1511.08458 [accessed 4 August 2025].
9. Ayuso SA, Elhage SA, Zhang Y, et al. Predicting rare outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction using image-based deep learning
models. Surgery. 2023;173:748-55. DOI PubMed
10. Wilson HH, Ma C, Ku D, et al. Deep learning model utilizing clinical data alone outperforms image-based model for hernia recurrence
following abdominal wall reconstruction with long-term follow up. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:3984-91. DOI PubMed PMC
11. Bamba Y, Ogawa S, Itabashi M, et al. Object and anatomical feature recognition in surgical video images based on a convolutional
neural network. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021;16:2045-54. DOI PubMed PMC
12. Tabja Bortesi JP, Ranisau J, Di S, et al. Machine learning approaches for the image-based identification of surgical wound infections:
scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e52880. DOI PubMed PMC
13. Tanner J, Rochon M, Harris R, et al. Digital wound monitoring with artificial intelligence to prioritise surgical wounds in cardiac
surgery patients for priority or standard review: protocol for a randomised feasibility trial (WISDOM). BMJ Open. 2024;14:e086486.
DOI PubMed PMC
14. McLean KA, Sgrò A, Brown LR, et al. Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice. NPJ
Digit Med. 2023;6:85. DOI PubMed PMC
15. Rochon M, Tanner J, Jurkiewicz J, et al. Wound imaging software and digital platform to assist review of surgical wounds using
patient smartphones: the development and evaluation of artificial intelligence (WISDOM AI study). PLoS One. 2024;19:e0315384.
DOI PubMed PMC
16. Fletcher RR, Schneider G, Bikorimana L, et al. The use of mobile thermal imaging and deep learning for prediction of surgical site
infection. In: 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC); 2021 Nov
1-5; Mexico. New York: IEEE; 2021. pp. 5059-62.
17. Mayol J. Transforming abdominal wall surgery with generative artificial intelligence. J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023;2:12419. DOI
PubMed PMC
18. Talwar A, Shen C, Shin JH. Natural language processing in plastic surgery patient consultations. Art Int Surg. 2025;5:46-52. DOI
19. Lancet. AI in medicine: creating a safe and equitable future. Lancet. 2023;402:503. DOI PubMed
20. Castelvecchi D. Can we open the black box of AI? Nature. 2016;538:20-3. DOI PubMed
21. Pierce RL, Van Biesen W, Van Cauwenberge D, Decruyenaere J, Sterckx S. Explainability in medicine in an era of AI-based clinical
decision support systems. Front Genet. 2022;13:903600. DOI PubMed PMC
22. Ghassemi M, Oakden-Rayner L, Beam AL. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care.
Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3:e745-50. DOI PubMed
23. Reddy S. Explainability and artificial intelligence in medicine. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e214-5. DOI PubMed
24. Gaetani M, Mazwi M, Balaci H, Greer R, Maratta C. Artificial intelligence in medicine and the pursuit of environmentally responsible
science. Lancet Digit Health. 2024;6:e438-40. DOI PubMed
25. World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. pp.
xi, 34. Available from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200. [Last accessed on 4 Aug 2025]
26. Thompson N, Greenewald K, Lee K, Manso GF. The computational limits of deep learning. Proceedings of the Ninth Computing
within Limits Conference; 2023 June 13-15; Virtual. New York: ACM; 2023.
27. Abid A, Sinha P, Harpale A, Gichoya J, Purkayastha S. Optimizing medical image classification models for edge devices. In: Matsui
K, Omatu S, Yigitcanlar T, González SR, Editors. Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Volume 1: 18th International
Conference. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence; 2021 Oct 6-8;
Salamanca, Spain. Cham: Springer; 2022. pp 77-87.
28. Allam K. Adoption of artificial intelligence in cloud computing. Int J Comput Trends Technol. 2023;71:91-5. DOI