Page 29 - Read Online

Body et al. Art Int Surg 2022;2:186-94 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2022.28 Page 192

help to hasten the surgical learning curve, reducing the time needed to reach proficiency in training in
addition to altering trainee competency assessment. Ultimately, and importantly, it will also improve patient
safety.

DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Made substantial contributions to research and writing of the paper: Body S, Kawka M, Gall TMH

Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship
None.

Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.

Consent for publication
Not applicable.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.

REFERENCES
1. Qin R, Kendrick ML, Wolfgang CL, et al. International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatobiliary
Surg Nutr 2020;9:464-83. DOI PubMed PMC
2. Keus F, de Jong JAF, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJHM. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic
cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(4):CD006231. DOI PubMed
3. Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA, Sauerland S. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;11:CD001546. DOI PubMed PMC
4. Liang S, Hameed U, Jayaraman S. Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:14246-54.
DOI PubMed PMC
5. Deoliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to
633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2006;244:931-9. DOI PubMed PMC
6. Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen JG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND. Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc
2006;20:730-3. DOI PubMed
7. Wang M, Peng B, Liu J, et al. Practice patterns and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in China: a
retrospective multicenter analysis of 1029 patients. Ann Surg 2021;273:145-53. DOI PubMed
8. Adam MA, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: practice patterns
and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg 2015;262:372-7. DOI PubMed
9. Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang CE, et al. Early national experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal
adenocarcinoma: a comparison of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy from the National
Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg 2015;221:175-84. DOI
10. van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours
(LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;4:199-207.
DOI PubMed
11. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Topal B, et al; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Outcomes of a multicenter training program in laparoscopic
pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-2). Ann Surg 2019;269:344-50. DOI
12. Choi S, Song JH, Lee S, et al. Trends in clinical outcomes and long-term survival after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single
high-volume center experience of consecutive 2000 patients. Gastric Cancer 2022;25:275-86. DOI PubMed